VARDHMAN TEXTILES LTD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, LUDHIANA

CWP/28369/2017HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01098327201707 March 2019Author: MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL,MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL2 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Facts

The petitioner, Vardhman Textiles Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated March 29, 2017, issued under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act and an order dated September 29, 2017, rejecting objections filed under Section 148 of the Act. The assessment year in question was 2010-11. The respondent was the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Ludhiana. The revenue informed the High Court that the assessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Act had been dropped via an order dated February 28, 2019. Consequently, the petitioner requested the writ petition be disposed of as infructuous.

Held

The High Court noted that the revenue had communicated that the assessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Act for the assessment year 2010-11 had been dropped vide an order dated February 28, 2019. In light of this development, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the writ petition had become infructuous. The Court acknowledged this submission and ordered accordingly. The primary finding was that the challenge to the assessment proceedings was rendered moot by the revenue's subsequent action of dropping the proceedings. No specific issue regarding the merits of the original assessment proceedings was decided, as the case was disposed of on a procedural ground. The operative direction was to dispose of the writ petition as infructuous.

Key Issues

1. Whether the writ petition challenging the notice under Section 147 and the order rejecting objections under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act is rendered infructuous, given that the assessment proceedings have been dropped by the revenue. Assessee's contention: The petitioner argued that since the assessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Act have been dropped by the revenue, the present writ petition has become infructuous and should be disposed of accordingly. Revenue's contention: The revenue, through a communication from the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, informed the High Court that the assessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Act for assessment year 2010-11 have been dropped vide an order dated February 28, 2019. The revenue did not contest the petitioner's prayer.

Sections Cited

Section 147, Section 148

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28369-2017 Decided on: 07.03.2019 Vardhman Textiles Ltd .... Petitioner Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Ludhiana ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Present: Mr. M. S. Kanda, Advocate for the petitioner-assessee. Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Sr. Standing Counsel for the respondent-revenue. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL

, J (ORAL)

The petitioner by way of amended writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, had challenged the notice dated 29.03.2017 (Annexure P-5) issued under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act (in short 'the Act') and order dated 29.09.2017 (Annexure P-7), whereby the official filed objections initiated under Section 148 of the Act, were rejected.

2.

Learned counsel for the revenue has produced the communication received from the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Ludhiana dated 01.03.2019 intimating him that the assessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Act on 29.03.2017 for the assessment year 2010-11 have been dropped vide order dated 28.02.2019. Copy of the office

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →