PAWAN KUMAR JAIN S/O SHRI NATHU LAL JAIN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Facts
The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Jain, filed three Civil Writ Petitions (Nos. 7130/2023, 7008/2023, and 7050/2023) before the Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench. The respondents were the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Jaipur, and the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Jaipur. The petitions challenged certain actions or orders of the revenue authorities. During the pendency of these petitions, an order under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was passed by the revenue.
Held
The Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petitions. The primary reason for the withdrawal was the passing of an order under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, during the pendency of the petitions. The Court granted the petitioner liberty to pursue alternative remedies as available under the law, including the option to file fresh petitions if deemed maintainable. The Court did not delve into the merits of the original challenge in the writ petitions. The operative direction was to dismiss the petitions as withdrawn with the liberty granted.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the writ petitions filed against the revenue authorities, given that an order under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, has been passed during the pendency of the petitions? Assessee's Contention: The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petitions, stating that an order under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, had been passed. The petitioner requested liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law, including filing fresh petitions if maintainable. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contention from the revenue's side regarding the withdrawal of the petitions.
Sections Cited
Section 147, Section 148
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
[2024:RJ-JP:27016-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7130/2023 Pawan Kumar Jain S/o Shri Nathu Lal Jain, Aged About 47 Years, R/o 13, Taru Chhaya Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur-302029 ----Petitioner Versus
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Jaipur, Room No. 408, 4Th Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-2, Lic Building, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur-302005
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005 ----Respondents Connected With D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7008/2023 Pawan Kumar Jain S/o Shri Nathu Lal Jain, Aged About 47 Years, R/o 13, Taru Chhaya Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur-302029 ----Petitioner Versus
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Jaipur, Room No. 408, 4Th Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-2, Lic Building, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur-302005
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005 ----Respondents D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7050/2023 Pawan Kumar Jain S/o Shri Nathu Lal Jain, Aged About 47 Years, R/o 13, Taru Chhaya Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur 302029. ----Petitioner V
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajlaxmi Agro Food Product Private Limited And Anr. vs. The Superint., CGST And Cx, Berhampore Range, Berhampore Division, Bolpur Commiss. And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shibsankar Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Alkem Laboratories Limited vs. Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise, RaigadBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Axis Bank LTD vs. State Of Maharashtra Thru. G P And AnrBombay · 6 Oct 2026