ESCORTS EMPLOYEES ANCILLARIES LTD. vs. CIT HY.ROHTAK
Facts
The assessee, Escorts Employees Ancillaries Ltd., made payments for know-how in the previous years 1982-83 and 1983-84, relevant to assessment years 1983-84 and 1984-85. The assessee sought to claim a deduction under Section 35AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which came into effect from April 1, 1986. The dispute centers on whether the deduction, calculated as 1/6th of the payment, could be allowed for payments made prior to the effective date of the section. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) had denied this deduction, leading to the present reference to the High Court.
Held
The High Court held that the ITAT was correct in law in denying the deduction under Section 35AB for payments made prior to April 1, 1986. The Court reasoned that Section 35AB(1) came into effect from April 1, 1986, and the amending Act did not provide for retrospective operation. Allowing the deduction for payments made before the enactment date would amount to giving retrospective effect to the provision, which was not intended. The Court found that the phrase "any previous year" should be interpreted to mean a previous year after the enactment of Section 35AB(1). The Court also distinguished the Gujarat High Court judgment relied upon by the assessee, stating it was inapplicable as it dealt with depreciation, not the applicability of a newly introduced section to prior payments. The Madras High Court judgment cited by the assessee was also deemed irrelevant as the expenditure in that case was incurred after the section came into force. Therefore, the question of law was answered in favour of the revenue.
Key Issues
1. Whether the ITAT was correct in law in holding that deduction under Section 35AB could not be allowed in respect of payments made prior to April 1, 1986, thereby denying a deduction of Rs. 1,26,944/- (being 1/6th of Rs. 7,61,666/-)? Assessee's Contentions: The assessee argued that while Section 35AB(1) came into force on April 1, 1986, its wording, including phrases like "any previous year" and "that previous year," indicates that it applies to previous years even where payments were made before April 1, 1986, provided the six-year period for deductions extends beyond April 1, 1986. The assessee relied on CIT v. Shri Vallabh Glass Works Limited (207 ITR 963) (Gujarat) to support this interpretation. Revenue's Contentions: The revenue contended that accepting the assessee's argument would give retrospective effect to Section 35AB(1), which was intended to operate prospectively from its enactment date of April 1, 1986. The revenue argued that the Tribunal had rightly rejected the assessee's claim.
Sections Cited
Section 35AB, Section 32
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
I.T.R. No.49 of 1998. Decided on:-January 10, 2014. Escorts Employees Ancillaries Ltd. Faridabad. .........Applicant.
Versus The Commissioner of Income-Tax Haryana, Rohtak. ...........Respondent. CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajive Bhalla Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon.
***** Present:- Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate and Mr. Aalok Mittal, Advocate for the applicant-assessee. Mr. Tejinder Joshi, Advocate for the respondent-revenue. Rajive Bhalla, J.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi Bench “D” (hereinafter referred to as, the Tribunal) had forwarded the following question of law for an answer:
“Whether the ITAT was correct in law in the facts the circumstances of the case in holding that deduction under section 35AB could not be allowed in respect of payments made prior to 1.4.1986 and thereby denying deduction of Rs.1,26,944/- being 1/6th of Rs.7,61,666/-?” Yag Dutt 2014.01.22 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2-
Counsel for the assessee submits that the assessee made payment for know-how in the previous years 1982-
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smita Chawda vs. Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Sahil vs. M/S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Mayank Arc And Electrodes Private Limited & Anr. vs. Assistant Commissioner CGST Laxmi Nagar Division & Ors.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Jogender Proprietor Of M/S J.K. Construction vs. The Joint Commissioner (Appeals-Ii) & Anr.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Murugan Tyres vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1/ The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 6 Oct 2026