MODGIL FASHION EXPORTS, 2, BAL SINGH NAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LUDHIANA

ITA/260/2014HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01109398201425 September 2014Author: MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL,MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The appellant, Modgil Fashion Exports, is challenging an order dated 06.03.2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench 'A'. The primary issue revolves around the applicability of Section 80IA(9) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in relation to deductions permissible under Sections 80HHC and 80IB of the Act. The appeal was filed before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The assessment years are not explicitly stated in the provided text. The dispute concerns the interpretation and application of specific sections of the Income Tax Act concerning deductions.

Held

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by Modgil Fashion Exports. The Court noted that the controversy in question was not a new one and had already been decided against the appellant in the case of "Friends Casting P. Ltd. Vs. CIT [340 ITR 305 (P&H)]". The counsel for the appellant was unable to distinguish this precedent. Consequently, as the substantial question of law framed in the present appeal had been answered by the aforementioned judgment, the High Court found no alternative but to dismiss the appeal in terms of the opinion recorded in "Friends Casting P. Ltd. Vs. CIT". No specific issue was left undecided.

Key Issues

1. Whether Section 80IA(9) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, restricts deductions allowable under Sections 80HHC and 80IB of the Act? (Question of law) Assessee's contention: The appellant, Modgil Fashion Exports, argued that the Tribunal's order was incorrect concerning the operation of Section 80IA(9) vis-à-vis deductions under Sections 80HHC and 80IB. However, specific arguments or reliance on authorities by the appellant are not detailed in the judgment. Revenue's contention: The respondent, Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana, presumably supported the Tribunal's order. The judgment does not record specific arguments made by the revenue.

Sections Cited

80IA(9), 80HHC, 80IB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

ITA

-260-2014 (O&M)

[ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

ITA

-260-2014 (O&M)

Date of decision: 25.09.2014

Modgil Fashion Exports

..... Appellant

VERSUS Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana ..... Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present: Mr.Pankaj Jain, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocate, and Mr.Divya Suri, Advocate, for the appellant.

******* RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL) The appellant challenges order dated 06.03.2014, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench 'A', Chandigarh, primarily on the question of operation of Section 80IA (9) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') vis-a-vis deductions to be allowed under Sections 80HHC and 80IB of the Act.

We have heard counsel for the appellant and perused the impugned order as well as the substantial questions of law. The controversy, in hand, is no longer re-integra and ha

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →