M/S GREATER LUDHIANA AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Greater Ludhiana Area Development Authority, Ludhiana, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondent was the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana. The petitioner sought disposal of the writ petition as infructuous. This was because the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals, Ludhiana, had already decided an appeal. The petitioner requested that an interim order dated 04.03.2014 be continued for three weeks, as they had filed an appeal with a stay application before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which was not sitting that week. The High Court was considering the writ petition.
Held
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh held that the writ petition filed by the petitioner was disposed of as infructuous. This decision was based on the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner, indicating that the appeal had been decided by the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals, Ludhiana. The Court also ordered that the interim order dated 04.03.2014 would remain in force for three weeks, accommodating the petitioner's submission regarding the filing of an appeal with a stay application before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and its non-sitting schedule. The High Court did not decide the merits of the case but rather disposed of the petition based on the procedural developments.
Key Issues
1. Whether the writ petition filed by the petitioner has become infructuous in light of the appeal being decided by the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals, Ludhiana? (Question of fact) Contentions: Assessee (Petitioner): Submitted that the appeal having been decided by the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals, Ludhiana, the present writ petition has become infructuous and may be disposed of accordingly. They also requested the continuation of an interim order for three weeks due to the unavailability of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Revenue (Respondent): No specific arguments recorded for the respondent in the provided text.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-4011-2014
Date of decision: 05.11.2014
M/s Greater Ludhiana Area Development Authority, Ludhiana ..... Petitioner
VERSUS Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana ..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present: Mr.Ravi Shankar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Katoch, Advocate, for the respondent.
******* RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner submits that as the appeal has been decided by the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals, Ludhiana, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of accordingly and interim order dated 04.03.2014 may be ordered to continue for three weeks as the petitioner has filed an appeal alongwith an application for stay but the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is not sitting in this week. In view of statement made by counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as inf
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jitin Batra Proprietor Of M/S. Dreamz Conference And Event Management Group vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 60 & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Saraogi vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Howrah And Kadamtala Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 7 Oct 2026
- Neeraj Massey vs. Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 7 Oct 2026
- Padu Paraja vs. The Commnr. Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- The Lead Factory vs. The Assistant Commissoner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 7 Oct 2026