GOPALBHAI GOVINDLAL CHOKSHI vs. DY C I T (ASSESSMENT)
Facts
The assessee, Gopalkhai Govindlal Chokshi, appealed against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench, dated June 26, 2000. The appeal concerned block assessment years 1986-87 to 1996-97. The core issue was whether deductions under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, could be claimed from income computed under Chapter XIV-B, which deals with block assessments and undisclosed income. The assessee contended that a subsequent amendment to Section 158BB of the Act, made retrospective by a Gujarat High Court decision, allowed for such deductions.
Held
The Gujarat High Court held that the amended provision to Section 158BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is retrospectively applicable, as per its own decision in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. N.R. Paper and Board Ltd. Consequently, the assessee is entitled to claim deductions under Chapter VI-A of the Act from the income computed as undisclosed income under Chapter XIV-B. The High Court found that the question raised in the appeal was answered in favour of the assessee. The operative direction was to allow the appeal, confirming the assessee's entitlement to the deductions. No issue was expressly left undecided.
Key Issues
1. Whether deductions under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, are allowable from the income computed as undisclosed income under Chapter XIV-B of the Act? (Question of law) Assessee's Contention: The assessee argued that the issue was covered by the Gujarat High Court's decision in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. N.R. Paper and Board Ltd. ([2009] 313 ITR 359). This decision held that the amendment to Section 158BB of the Act by the Finance Act, 2002, was retrospective, entitling the assessee to claim deductions under Chapter VI-A. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue, through its counsel, was not in a position to oppose the assessee's submission and did not oppose the appeal.
Sections Cited
Section 158BB, Chapter VI-A, Chapter XIV-B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
O/TAXAP/444/2000 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 444 of 2000
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER ================================================================ 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ================================================================ GOPALBHAI GOVINDLAL CHOKSHI....Appellant(s) Versus DY C I T (ASSESSMENT)....Opponent(s) ================================================================ Appearance: MR MANISH J SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR KM PARIKH, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ================================================================ CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH an
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026