COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - II vs. S K DISTRICT TELECOM EMPLOYEE CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD
Facts
The Revenue, Commissioner of Income Tax - II, has appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated January 31, 2014, for Assessment Year 2009-10. The ITAT had confirmed the order of the CIT(A), which allowed the assessee, S K District Telecom Employee Co-Op Credit Society Ltd., a deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This decision resulted in the deletion of an addition of Rs. 35,14,938/- made by the Assessing Officer. The appeal is before the High Court of Gujarat.
Held
The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue. The Court noted that the ITAT had relied on this Court's decision in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Jafari Momin Vikas Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. The High Court found that the decision in Jafari Momin Vikas Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. was squarely applicable. In that case, the Division Bench had observed that Sub-Section (4) of Section 80P would not apply to the assessee, which is not a Co-operative Bank. The Court affirmed that Section 80P(4) excludes co-operative banks, but not credit societies that are not co-operative banks. Since the respondent-assessee was admittedly a credit co-operative society and not a credit co-operative bank, the exclusion under Section 80P(4) was not applicable. Therefore, the High Court saw no reason to interfere with the ITAT's order and held the proposed substantial question of law against the revenue.
Key Issues
1. Whether the appellate tribunal has substantially erred in confirming the order of the CIT(A) holding that the assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act thereby deleting the addition of Rs.35,14,938/-? Assessee's contentions: Not recorded in the judgment. Revenue's contentions: The revenue argued that the assessee is not entitled to the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The revenue relied on Section 80P(4) of the Act, contending that it excludes credit societies that are not co-operative banks from the benefit of deduction under Section 80P. The revenue's argument was that Section 80P(4) would exclude not only co-operative banks other than those fulfilling specific descriptions but also credit societies which are not co-operative banks.
Sections Cited
Section 80P(2)(a)(i), Section 80P(4)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
O/TAXAP/534/2014 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 534 of 2014
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER
====================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ====================================== COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - II....Appellant(s) Versus S K DISTRICT TELECOM EMPLOYEE CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD....Opponent(s) ====================================== Appearance: MR MANISH BHATT, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1 ====================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER
Date : 23/06/2014
ORAL JUDGMENT O/TAXAP/534/2014
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The Lead Factory vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes.Karnataka · 7 Oct 2026
- Dolphin Motor Agency, Cuttack vs. Additional Commissioner Of State Tax (Appeal), Central Zone-Ii, CuttackOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Devendra Singh Kanyal vs. Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 7 Oct 2026
- Trivitron Healthcare Private LTD vs. Deputy Commissioner Division Vi CGST Central Excise Commissionerate BelapurBombay · 7 Oct 2026
- Mr Ca Mukunda vs. Mr. Ca. Shiva Prakash H SKarnataka · 7 Oct 2026