COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -II vs. MANAV INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.
Facts
The Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax - II) filed a Tax Appeal before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad challenging an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The ITAT had dismissed the Revenue's appeal, thereby upholding the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) which deleted a penalty of Rs. 37,58,994/- imposed under Section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessment year in question was 2008-09. The High Court admitted the appeal to consider a substantial question of law. During the hearing, both the Revenue and the assessee (Manav Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.) agreed to a remand of the matter to the ITAT.
Held
The High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the matter to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The impugned judgment and order of the ITAT dated 29.11.2013 was quashed and set aside. The ITAT was directed to decide the appeal against the order of penalty afresh after the quantum appeal, which was pending before the ITAT, is decided first. The Court explicitly stated that no observations were made regarding the penalty imposed under Section 271AAA in favour of either party, as the decision was based on the consensus of the parties to remand the matter. The operative direction is to reconsider the penalty appeal after the quantum appeal is resolved.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Appellate Tribunal has substantially erred in upholding the order of the CIT(A) deleting the penalty of Rs.37,58,994/- levied u/s. 271AAA of the Act? (Question of law) Assessee's Contentions: Not recorded in the judgment. Revenue's Contentions: The Revenue argued that the ITAT erred in deleting the penalty imposed under Section 271AAA. The specific grounds for this contention and any authorities or precedents relied upon are not detailed in the judgment.
Sections Cited
Section 271AAA
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
O/TAXAP/484/2014 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 484 of 2014
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER ================================================================ 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ================================================================ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -II....Appellant(s) Versus MANAV INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.....Opponent(s) ================================================================ Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR TUSHAR P HEMANI, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1 MS VAIBHAVI K PARIKH, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ==================================
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026