SYNBIOTICS LIMITED vs. ASST. CIT
Facts
The appellant, Synbiotics Limited, is challenging the judgment and order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad 'C' Bench. The appeals concern assessment years 1985-86, 1986-87, and 1987-88. The core of the dispute involves the disallowance of deductions claimed by the assessee for amounts payable to the Drug Prices Equalization Account under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979. The amounts in dispute for these years are Rs. 4,41,46,682/-, Rs. 2,90,34,720/-, and Rs. 13,01,844/-, respectively. The High Court admitted these appeals and framed substantial questions of law.
Held
The High Court held that it should not take a different view from its previous decision in Synbiotics Limited v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax and Others (dated 09.04.2009 in Tax Appeal No.380/1999), which dealt with identical facts and questions of law. Consequently, the High Court disposed of the appeals by answering the framed questions in favour of the assessee and against the revenue for all the assessment years under consideration. The reasoning is based on the principle of consistency and adherence to precedent established by the same court. The operative direction is that the appeals stand disposed of with the questions answered in favour of the assessee. No issue was expressly left undecided.
Key Issues
The Tribunal had to decide the following questions of law: 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in confirming the disallowance of deduction of Rs. 4,41,46,682/- payable to the Drug Prices Equalization Account under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979 (for AY 1985-86)? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in confirming the disallowance of deduction of Rs. 2,90,34,720/- payable to the Drug Prices Equalization Account under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979 (for AY 1986-87)? 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in confirming the disallowance of deduction of Rs. 13,01,844/- payable to the Drug Prices Equalization Account under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979 (for AY 1987-88)? The revenue contended that the questions raised in these appeals should be answered against the assessee, relying on the High Court's prior decision in Synbiotics Limited v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax and Others dated 09.04.2009 in Tax Appeal No.380/1999, where the facts and questions of law were identical. The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the assessee.
Sections Cited
Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1979
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
O/TAXAP/250/2005 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 250 of 2005 With TAX APPEAL NO. 251 of 2005 With TAX APPEAL NO. 253 of 2005
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER ================================================================ 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? No 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? No 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? No 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? No ================================================================ SYNBIOTICS LIMITED....Appellant(s) Versus ASST. CIT....Opponent(s) ================================================================ Appearance: NOTICE SERVED for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MRS MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1 O/TAXAP/250/2005
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Prakash Enterprises Its Proprietor Sudhir Kumar Choudhary vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sree Narayan Construction vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Recro Furniture Private Limited vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- Ipca Laboratories LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA Through The Jt. Secretary, Dept. Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Scottment Alco Bev Fillers PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026