COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. GANDHI SPICES LTD.

TAXAP/1885/2005HC GujaratGJHC24035279200513 November 2014Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KS JHAVERI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.J.THAKER4 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The assessee, Gandhi Spices Ltd., filed its income tax return for assessment year 1998-99 on November 2, 1998, declaring a total income of Rs. 6,24,750. The return was initially processed under Section 143(1)(a) without adjustments. Subsequently, the case was selected for scrutiny, and a notice under Section 143(2) was issued. An assessment order was passed, which the assessee appealed to the CIT(A). The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal. The Revenue then appealed to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Rajkot Bench, which dismissed the appeal. The Revenue has now filed this Tax Appeal before the High Court challenging the ITAT's order.

Held

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. The Court noted that the total revenue effect in the present case was less than Rs. 1 lakh. Citing CBDT Instruction No. 1979 dated March 27, 2000, which advises against filing appeals where the revenue effect is less than Rs. 1 lakh, the Court held that the Revenue ought not to have preferred this appeal. Consequently, the appeal was not entertained, and the questions of law were answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal.

Key Issues

1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is justified in holding that the process of production in the case of the assessee is required to be treated as “manufacturing” within the provisions of Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act? (Question of law) 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is justified in holding that the assessee is engaged in a manufacturing process and entitled to claim deduction under Section 80-IA of the Act? (Question of law) Assessee's contentions: Not recorded in the judgment. Revenue's contentions: Not recorded in the judgment.

Sections Cited

80-IA, 143(1)(a), 143(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

O/TAXAP/1885/2005 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 1885 of 2005

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI

and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER

================================================================ 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ================================================================ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX....Appellant(s) Versus GANDHI SPICES LTD.....Opponent(s) ================================================================ Appearance: MR PRANAV G DESAI, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MRS SWATI SOPARKAR, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ================================================================ CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS J

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →