MITSU INDUSTRIES LIMITED vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Facts
The assessee, Mitsu Industries Limited, filed its return of income for assessment year 1996-97 declaring a total loss. The assessment was completed under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. During assessment proceedings, the assessee was questioned regarding the actual cost of a Wind Mill and the depreciation claimed. The Assessing Officer allowed depreciation on the Wind Mill. The assessee appealed to the CIT(A), which was partly allowed. The assessee then appealed to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which dismissed the appeal. The present appeal is filed by the assessee against the ITAT's order.
Held
The High Court allowed the appeal. It noted that the issue involved notional income from an advance licence benefit. The Court referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Excel Industries Ltd. (358 ITR 295), which was stated to be squarely applicable. Based on this precedent, the Court concluded that the notional income was not taxable. The substantial question of law was answered in favour of the assessee and against the department. The operative direction was to allow the appeal.
Key Issues
1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in concluding that the alleged notional income from advance licence benefit receivable amounting to Rs. 2,02,54,522/- has accrued as taxable income for the assessment year under consideration? (Question of law). Assessee's contention: The income sought to be taxed was notional and arose without the assessee exercising the option of importing goods. The assessee relied on the Supreme Court decision in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Excel Industries Ltd., reported in 358 ITR 295. Revenue's contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the revenue.
Sections Cited
44AB, 143(1)(a), 143(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
O/TAXAP/1879/2005 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 1879 of 2005
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER
================================================================ 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ================================================================ MITSU INDUSTRIES LIMITED....Appellant(s) Versus ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX....Opponent(s) ================================================================ Appearance: MR RK PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR SUDHIR M MEHTA, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ================================================================ CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTIC
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026