ASSTT.C.I.T. vs. EMTICI ENGINEERING LTD
Facts
The assessee, EMTICI ENGINEERING LTD., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 1986-87 declaring a total income of Rs. 61,23,838. The Assessing Officer (AO) passed an order under Section 143(3) on March 21, 1989. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) partly allowed the assessee's appeal on July 7, 1989. Both the assessee and the Revenue appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The ITAT, by its order dated August 20, 1999, partly allowed the assessee's appeal and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. The Revenue has filed the present Tax Appeals challenging the ITAT's order. The High Court admitted the appeal on December 6, 2000, formulating a substantial question of law concerning the deletion of interest amounting to Rs. 3,06,207 attributable to investment in shares.
Held
The High Court held that the issue involved in the present appeals was already concluded by its earlier decision in Tax Appeal No. 255/2000, decided on November 17, 2014. In that earlier case, the High Court noted that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) had decided the issue in favour of the assessee by relying on orders passed in earlier years, which was concurred by the Appellate Tribunal. The High Court observed that the issue had not been carried in appeal before it in earlier years, and therefore, those orders had become final. Consequently, the High Court found no illegality with the judgment rendered by the Appellate Tribunal and concurred with its view. The appeal was accordingly dismissed. The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. No elaborate reasons were given as the issue was considered concluded.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Appellate Tribunal was right in law and on facts in confirming the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) deleting the interest of Rs. 3,06,207 attributable to investment in shares? The Revenue contended that the ITAT erred in confirming the deletion of interest. The assessee argued that the deletion was justified, relying on earlier years' orders which had become final as they were not carried further in appeal to the High Court. The judgment also refers to a previous Tax Appeal No. 255/2000, which involved a similar issue regarding notional interest attributable to investment in shares, where the High Court had dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
Sections Cited
Section 260A, Section 143(3), Section 256(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
O/TAXAP/2/2000 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 2 of 2000
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER
================================================================ 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ================================================================ ASSTT.C.I.T.....Appellant(s) Versus EMTICI ENGINEERING LTD....Opponent(s) ================================================================ Appearance: MR KM PARIKH, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR RK PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ================================================================ CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI and HONOURABLE MR.JUST
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026