THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 6 vs. B. SURESHKUMAR & CO (RF)
Facts
The assessee, B. Suresh Kumar & Co (RF), a registered partnership firm engaged in diamond export, filed its return for AY 2003-04 declaring Rs. 50,13,903/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) determined the total income at Rs. 77,89,970/-. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] partly allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the AO to consider the value of rejected diamonds for Section 80HHC deduction by including them in export turnover. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partly allowed the assessee's appeal. The Revenue has filed the present Tax Appeal against the ITAT's order dated 29.06.2007.
Held
The High Court noted that the issue raised in the appeal was concluded by its prior decision in Tax Appeal No. 62/2006, decided on 28.09.2006. In that decision, the Court had considered a similar question (Question E) concerning the eligibility of export of rejected and rough diamonds for deduction under Section 80HHC. The Court had held that when admitted facts are that they are exported, they are eligible for deduction under Section 80HHC. Therefore, the High Court found no case for admission of the appeal on this ground. The Court answered the question of law in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue, disposing of the appeal accordingly.
Key Issues
1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is right in coming to the conclusion that the sale proceeds of the rejected diamonds is required to be treated as part of export turnover for the purpose of working out deduction available under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act? The Revenue contended that the ITAT erred in its decision. The judgment does not record specific arguments from the assessee's side regarding this issue. However, the High Court's admission order indicates that the Revenue is challenging the ITAT's finding that rejected diamonds should be included in export turnover for Section 80HHC deduction.
Sections Cited
Section 80HHC, Section 260A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
O/TAXAP/285/2008 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 285 of 2008
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER
================================================================ 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ================================================================ THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 6....Appellant(s) Versus B. SURESHKUMAR & CO (RF)....Opponent(s) ================================================================ Appearance: MR SUDHIR M MEHTA, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1 RULE UNSERVED for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ================================================================ CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Nagarbhavi Club (R) vs. The State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 6 Oct 2026
- Newton Engineering And Chemicals Limited vs. Indian Oil Corporation LTD.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Life Insurance Corporation Of INDIA vs. N.S. Associates PVT. LTDDelhi · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Ideal Pharma, Through Its Proprietor Manish Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIA Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Surya Agro Fuels vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesMadras · 6 Oct 2026