STANDARD TEA PROCESSING CO.LTD vs. DY.C.I.T. (ASSTT.)

TAXAP/244/2002HC GujaratGJHC24020696200221 November 2014Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KS JHAVERI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.J.THAKER3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The assessee, Standard Tea Processing Co. Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 1992-93 on 30.12.1992, showing a total income of Rs. 64,66,310/-. The return was processed under Section 143(1)(a) on 22.3.1993. Following assessment proceedings, the assessee appealed to the CIT(A), which was partly allowed. A further appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench “C”, in ITA No. 4332/Ahd/1995, was also partly allowed. The present Tax Appeal is filed by the assessee against the ITAT's order dated 8.1.2002.

Held

The High Court held that the process of blending tea does not produce an article or thing within the meaning of Section 80I of the Income Tax Act, 1961, so as to bring into existence an article or thing which is a different commercial commodity. The Court's reasoning was based on the decision of the Apex Court in Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Tara Agencies, reported in 292 ITR 444. The Court found that this issue was governed by the Apex Court's ruling, which was not disputed by the assessee's counsel. Consequently, the substantial question of law was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. The Tax Appeal was dismissed.

Key Issues

1. Whether the process of blending tea produces an article or thing within the meaning of Section 80I of the Income Tax Act, 1961, resulting in a commercially different commodity? (Question of law) Assessee's Contention: The assessee contended that the blending of tea results in a new article or thing, qualifying for deduction under Section 80I. (No specific authorities or precedents were recorded as relied upon by the assessee in the judgment). Revenue's Contention: The Revenue relied on the decision of the Apex Court in Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Tara Agencies, reported in 292 ITR 444, to argue that the process of blending tea does not produce a new article or thing for the purpose of Section 80I.

Sections Cited

Section 80I, Section 143(1)(a), Section 142(1), Section 143(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

O/TAXAP/244/2002 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 244 of 2002

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI

and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER

================================================================ 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ================================================================ STANDARD TEA PROCESSING CO.LTD....Appellant(s) Versus DY.C.I.T. (ASSTT.)....Opponent(s) ================================================================ Appearance: MR MANISH J SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MRS MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ================================================================ CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS J

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →