PR. COMMISSIONER OF INOCME TAX-1, CHD vs. M/S YPT ENTERTAINMENT HOUSE P. LTD.

ITA/232/2022HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01083541202227 February 2024Author: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA3 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Facts

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Chandigarh (the Revenue) filed an appeal before the Punjab and Haryana High Court against an order concerning M/s YPT Entertainment House P. Ltd. (the assessee). The assessee's counsel raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal before the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The objection was based on the Supreme Court's judgment in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh vs. ABC Papers Ltd. (2022) 9 SCC 1. The assessee argued that jurisdiction for the appeal should lie with the Allahabad High Court, as the Assessing Officer in this case was situated in Noida. The counsel for the Revenue did not object to this submission.

Held

The High Court, in view of the Supreme Court's decision in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh vs. ABC Papers Ltd. (2022) 9 SCC 1, held that the jurisdiction for filing an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, lies with the High Court within whose territorial jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who passed the assessment order is situated. The Court noted that the assessment order was passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Noida, and the appeal was heard by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kanpur. Therefore, the jurisdiction would lie with the Allahabad High Court. The appeal was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file it before the appropriate court of jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

Key Issues

1. Whether the jurisdiction for filing an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, lies with the High Court within whose territorial jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who passed the assessment order is situated, or with the High Court within whose territorial jurisdiction the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) bench is located? (Question of law, turning on Section 260-A). Contentions: Assessee: Relied on the Supreme Court judgment in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh vs. ABC Papers Ltd. (2022) 9 SCC 1, arguing that jurisdiction vests with the High Court where the Assessing Officer is situated. In this case, the Assessing Officer being in Noida, the Allahabad High Court has jurisdiction. Revenue: Did not object to the assessee's contention regarding jurisdiction.

Sections Cited

260-A, 127

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

ITA-232-2022 (O&M)

2024:PHHC:026872-DB (THROUGH VC) 106

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

ITA-232-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.02.2024 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Chandigarh

. . . . Appellant Vs.

M/s YPT Entertainment House P. Ltd. . . . . Respondent **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA **** Present: Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Ved Jain, Advocate for the respondent. **** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)

1.

Notice of motion.

2.

Mr. Ved Jain, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent.

3.

Preliminary objection has been raised by the counsel for the respondent with regard to maintainability of the appeal on the basis of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chandigarh vs. ABC Papers Ltd. reported in (2022) 9 SCC 1, and submits that the juri iction would lie at Allahabad High Court as the Assessing Officer in the present case is of Noida.

4.

Learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue does not object to the said aspect.

5.

In ABC Papers Ltd. (supr

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →