PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), GURGAON vs. M/S RENAISSANCE BUILDCON COMPANY (P) LTD. (THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR)
Facts
The Revenue, identified as the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Gurgaon, filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench 'B'. The assessee is M/s Renaissance Buildcon Company (P) Ltd. The amount in dispute is Rs. 6,81,406/-. The appeal was filed on 12.07.2019. The Revenue's counsel acknowledged that the tax effect was below the monetary limits prescribed by Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
Held
The High Court allowed the Revenue's request to withdraw the appeal. The court noted that the tax effect was below the monetary limits stipulated in CBDT Circular No. 3/2018. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty was granted to the Revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in case any aspect of the matter survives. The legal issues that would have been adjudicated in the appeal were expressly left open for decision in an appropriate future case. No decision was made on the merits of the original dispute.
Key Issues
1. Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable in light of the monetary limits prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 3/2018? (Question of law) The Revenue argued that the tax effect involved in the appeal is less than the monetary limits fixed by Circular No. 3/2018 and sought permission to withdraw the appeal, requesting liberty to file an application for revival if something survives. The judgment does not record any specific arguments from the assessee.
Sections Cited
260-A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA-48-2019(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112 ITA-48-2019(O&M) Date of Decision : 12.07.2019 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Gurgaon ... Appellant Versus M/s Renaissance Buildcon Company (P) Ltd. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL Present: Mr. Kunal Sharma, Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant. HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J. The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench 'B' Chandigarh. Before proceeding further, from the perusal of the appeal it is forthcoming that the amount involved in the present appeal is only Rs.6,81,406/-.
Learned counsel for the appellant has not disputed the fact that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is less than the monetary limits fixed by Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by Central Board Director Taxes, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Pooja Saini 2019.07.25 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
ITA-48-2019(O&M) 2 Rev
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajlaxmi Agro Food Product Private Limited And Anr. vs. The Superint., CGST And Cx, Berhampore Range, Berhampore Division, Bolpur Commiss. And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shibsankar Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Alkem Laboratories Limited vs. Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise, RaigadBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Axis Bank LTD vs. State Of Maharashtra Thru. G P And AnrBombay · 6 Oct 2026