THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, FARIDABAD vs. M/S MANSHA BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS P. LTD

ITA/82/2019HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01147688201815 July 2019Author: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL2 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Facts

The Revenue, identified as the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax Faridabad, filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'E', New Delhi. The appeal was filed with a delay of 4 days, and a further delay of 47 days in re-filing, both of which were condoned by the High Court. The amount in dispute in the appeal was Rs. 3,30,960/-. The Revenue's counsel acknowledged that the tax effect was below the monetary limits prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018.

Held

The High Court allowed the Revenue's application to withdraw the appeal. The court noted that the Revenue's counsel did not dispute that the tax effect of Rs. 3,30,960/- was below the monetary limits stipulated by CBDT Circular No. 3/2018. Consequently, the Revenue sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The High Court granted this permission, dismissing the appeal as withdrawn. Crucially, the legal issues claimed by the Revenue were expressly left open for adjudication in an appropriate case, and liberty was granted to the Revenue to file an application for revival if circumstances warranted. No decision was made on the merits of the case.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable in light of the monetary limits prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 3/2018, given the tax effect of Rs. 3,30,960/-? (Question of law) Contentions: Assessee: No specific contentions recorded for the assessee. Revenue: The Revenue conceded that the tax effect involved in the appeal was less than the monetary limits fixed by Circular No. 3/2018. The Revenue sought permission to withdraw the appeal in view of this circular and prayed for liberty to file an application for revival if something survives.

Sections Cited

Section 260-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

ITA-82-2019 (O&M)

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 104 ITA-82-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.07.2019 Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax Faridabad ... Appellant Versus M/s Mansha Builders and Contractors P. Ltd.

...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL Present: Mr. Rajat Garg, Advocate for Mr. Tajender K.Joshi, Advocate for the appellant. HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J. CM-1308-CII-2019 This is an application under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 for condoning 4 days delay in filing the present appeal. The application is supported by a duly sworn affidavit.

For the reasons given in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 4 days in filing of the appeal is condoned. CM-1306-CII-2019 This is an application for condoning 47 days delay in re-filing the present appeal. The application is supported by a duly sworn affidavit.

For the reasons given in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 47 days in re-filing of the appeal is condoned. Pooja Saini 2019.07.24 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

ITA-82-2019

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →