THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, FARIDABAD vs. M/S DANONE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED
Facts
The revenue, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad, appealed against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 30.10.2019, which pertained to assessment year 2009-10. The assessee, M/s. Danone (India) Private Limited, a company providing technological and personnel support to the food processing and dairy industry, had declared Nil income after claiming losses. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed a significant portion of the business expenses amounting to Rs.10,28,95,398/-. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) partly allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the AO to obtain details of expenses incurred after the business setup date of 07.07.2008 until 31.03.2009, out of the disallowed amount of Rs.8,66,73,393/-. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s order, dismissing the revenue's appeal.
Held
The Tribunal held that the expenses incurred by the assessee from 07.07.2008 till 31.03.2009 were to be allowed as revenue expenditure. The reasoning was based on the finding that the assessee had set up its business on 07.07.2008, evidenced by the recruitment of key personnel like the Sales Head. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)'s direction to the Assessing Officer to obtain details of expenses amounting to Rs.8,66,73,393/- from the disallowed sum of Rs.10,28,95,398/-, pertaining to the period after the business setup date, and to allow these as deductions. The ratio decidendi is that expenses incurred for setting up and commencing business operations after the effective date of commencement are allowable as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal also noted that the revenue could not controvert the assessee's earned income of Rs.17.14 million in the subsequent financial year 2009-10. The appeal was dismissed.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Tribunal erred in holding that the expenses incurred by the assessee from 07.07.2008 till 31.03.2009 are to be allowed as revenue expenditure, considering the business was set up on 07.07.2008? (Question of mixed law and fact, turning on the interpretation of business commencement and allowability of expenses under the Income Tax Act, 1961). Assessee's contentions: The assessee argued that expenses incurred after the business setup date of 07.07.2008 were for business purposes and thus allowable. The CIT(A) and ITAT relied on the principle that once skillful personnel are deployed to carry on business, related expenditures are allowable as business expenses, citing Dhoomketu Builders & Development Pvt. Ltd. vs. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (2012) 17 taxmann.com 36 (ITA Delhi). Revenue's contentions: The revenue's appeal was primarily against the ITAT's affirmation of the CIT(A)'s order, which allowed expenses incurred after the business setup date. The revenue did not record specific arguments against the finding that the business was set up on 07.07.2008 or against the allowability of expenses post that date, other than challenging the ITAT's decision.
Sections Cited
Section 143(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA-131-2021 (O&M) -1- HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA-131-2021 (O&M)
Decided on 20.02.2023 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad ....Appellant Vs. M/s. Danone (India) Private Limited ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Junior Standing Counsel for the appellant. **** Ritu Bahri, J. CM-11088-CII-2021 Application is allowed and Annexures A-1 and A-2 are taken on record. ITA-131-2021 The revenue has come up in appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 30.10.2019 (in short, 'the Tribunal') passed in ITA No. 3433/Del/2016 for the assessment year 2009-10.
The brief facts of the case are that the respondent-assessee is a company engaged in the business of providing technological and personnel support to food processing and dairy industry. The assessee filed its return on 24.09.2008 declaring total income at Rs. Nil after claiming losses. The case was selected for scrutiny and notice under Section 143(2) was served upon the assessee. The total business expenses debited by the assessee to its Profit & Loss account for the year ended on 31.0
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mbd Alchemie Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Asa Corporate Catalyst INDIA Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Cresent Stationers vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii Ward 3 Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Drum Roll Advertising Private Limited Vani Sood vs. Commissioner Of Dgst & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026