THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S HRY. WAREHOUSING CORP.
Facts
The case involves an appeal filed by the Income Tax Department against M/s Haryan Warehousing Corporation, Panchkula. The appeal was filed before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The primary context of the appeal relates to a Circular No. 5/2024, subsequently amended by Circular No. 9/2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes. These circulars revised the monetary limits for filing appeals by the department before various judicial forums, including the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts, and the Supreme Court. The revised monetary limits for appeals before the High Court were set at Rs. 2 crore. The present appeal was filed by the department.
Held
The Tribunal noted that the appellant (Income Tax Department) submitted that in terms of Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17.09.2024, the monetary limits for filing appeals have been revised. The appellant further submitted that the present case does not fall within the exceptions provided in the circular. Consequently, the learned counsel for the appellant prayed for the withdrawal of the present appeal. The Tribunal allowed this prayer. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. All pending applications were also disposed of as withdrawn.
Key Issues
1. Whether the present appeal, filed by the Income Tax Department, is maintainable in light of the revised monetary limits prescribed by Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17.09.2024. The assessee argued that the appeal should be withdrawn as it does not fall within the exceptions mentioned in the circular and the tax effect is below the revised monetary limit. The assessee relied on Circular No. 9/2024. The revenue did not record any argument against the withdrawal of the appeal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
221-2 IN
THE COMMI M/S HARYAN
CORAM: H
H
Present: M
M
f
M M M M
* SANJEEV PR
C bearing No.9 Ministry of Fi the monetary ITAT, High C enhanced and have been tak d a a S 1 2 3 N THE HIGH COURT OF PU CHANDIG I D ISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PA NA WAREHOUSING CORPORA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Senior Stan Ms. Pridhi Sandhu, Jr. Standing C for the appellant-Income Tax Dep Mr.Rajesh Garg, Senior Advocat Ms. Neha Matharoo, Advocate, Mr. Mandeep Singh, Advocate an Ms. Latika Garg, Advocate, for t **** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) Counsel for the appellant submi /2024 dated 17.09.2024 issued inance, Department of Revenue, limits for filing of the appeals Court and SLPs/Appeals before d the Circular No.5/2024 has bee ken with the purpose to manage l “ 2. As a step towards man decided by the Board to revise t appeals in Income-tax cases a aforementioned Circular as follows Sl. No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-t
Before Income
Tax Tribunal
Before High Court
Before Supreme Court NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH ITA-89-2006 (O&M) Date of Decision:21.10.2024 PANCHKULA .…...Appellant (s) V/s. ATION, PANCH
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Nagarbhavi Club (R) vs. The State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 6 Oct 2026
- Newton Engineering And Chemicals Limited vs. Indian Oil Corporation LTD.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Life Insurance Corporation Of INDIA vs. N.S. Associates PVT. LTDDelhi · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Ideal Pharma, Through Its Proprietor Manish Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIA Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Surya Agro Fuels vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesMadras · 6 Oct 2026