PR COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX vs. ORANGE BUSINESS SERVICES INDIA SOLUTIONS PVT LTD
Facts
The appeal was filed by the Revenue against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The present case concerns the withdrawal of appeals by the department before the Supreme Court and High Courts, as per Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17.09.2024 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). This circular revises monetary limits for filing appeals to manage litigation. The revised limits are Rs. 60 lakh for appeals before the ITAT, Rs. 2 crore before the High Court, and Rs. 5 crore before the Supreme Court. These limits are applicable to all cases under the Income-tax Act, 1961, including TDS/TCS matters, with exceptions as per paragraphs 3.1 and 3.2 of Circular No. 5/2024.
Held
The Tribunal allowed the prayer for withdrawal of the appeal. The court noted that the revised monetary limits for filing appeals came into effect from 17.09.2024, the date of issuance of Circular No. 9/2024. These limits apply to appeals to be filed before the Supreme Court, High Court, and Tribunal, and also to appeals pending before these authorities. Since the present case does not fall within the exception clause of Circular No. 5/2024, the Revenue's counsel sought withdrawal of the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and all pending applications were disposed of.
Key Issues
1. Whether the revised monetary limits for filing appeals, as per Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17.09.2024, are applicable to the present appeal. Assessee's Contention: The learned counsel for the assessee prays for the withdrawal of the present appeal, stating that the case does not fall within the exception clause of Circular No. 5/2024, and therefore, the revised monetary limits are applicable. The Revenue has not recorded any specific contention in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA-278-2022 ( 106-2 IN T PR. COMMISS ORANGE BU CORAM: H
H Present: M
f
SANJEEV PR
Counsel No.9/20 the mon ITAT, H enhance have be b fi af S 1 2 3 (O&M) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJA **** Mr. Varun Issar, Sr. Standing Coun for the appellant/Revenue. **** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) l for the appellant submits that 024 dated 17.09.2024 issued by th netary limits for filing of the appe High Court and SLP/Appeals befo ed and the Circular No.5/2024 has b en taken with the purpose to manag “ 2. As a step towards manag been decided by the Board to revise filing of appeals in Income-tax cases a aforementioned Circular as follows: Sl. No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax
Before Income Tax Appella
Before High Court
Before Supreme Court
B AND HARYANA AT H ITA-278-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.10.2024 . . . . Appellant UTIONS PVT LTD . . . . Respondent EEV PRAKASH SHARMA AY VASHISTH nsel in terms of the Circular bearing he Central Board of Direct Taxes, eals by the department before the ore the Suprem
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026