THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( CENTRAL ) , LUDHIANA vs. M/S KALANEEDHI JEWELLERS LLP
Facts
This case involves an appeal by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax) against M/s Kalaneedhi Jewellers LLP. The appeal was filed before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The Revenue's counsel submitted that the appeal was being withdrawn in light of Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17.09.2024 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). This circular revises the monetary limits for filing appeals by the department before various authorities, including the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), High Court, and Supreme Court. The revised monetary limit for appeals before the High Court is Rs. 2 crore. The Revenue contended that the present appeal, due to the revised monetary limits, should be withdrawn.
Held
The Tribunal allowed the prayer for withdrawal of the appeal. The reasoning was based on the submission made by the Revenue's counsel regarding CBDT Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17.09.2024. This circular revised the monetary limits for filing appeals by the department. The revised limit for appeals before the High Court was set at Rs. 2 crore. The Revenue contended that the present appeal did not fall within the exception clause of Circular No. 5/2024, which pertains to cases not falling within the revised monetary limits. Consequently, the Revenue prayed for the withdrawal of the appeal. The Tribunal accepted this prayer. The operative direction was to allow the withdrawal of the appeal and dismiss it as withdrawn. All pending applications were also disposed of accordingly. No specific issue regarding the merits of the case was decided.
Key Issues
1. Whether the present appeal, filed by the Revenue, should be withdrawn in light of CBDT Circular No. 9/2024, which revises the monetary limits for filing appeals before the High Court to Rs. 2 crore. Assessee's Contentions: The assessee's counsel did not present any arguments as the Revenue sought withdrawal of the appeal. The judgment notes that the assessee's counsel was present but the appeal was being decided based on the Revenue's submission regarding the circular. Revenue's Contentions: The Revenue's counsel submitted that the appeal should be withdrawn in terms of Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17.09.2024. This circular revises the monetary limits for filing appeals by the department. The revised limit for appeals before the High Court is Rs. 2 crore. The Revenue argued that the present appeal falls within the exception clause of Circular No. 5/2024, which allows for withdrawal of appeals if they do not fall within the revised monetary limits, and therefore, prayed for withdrawal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA-224-2022 ( 231 IN T THE PR COM M/S KALANE CORAM: H
H Present: M M M
f
M
f SANJEEV PR
Counsel No.9/20 the mon ITAT, H enhance have be b fi af S 1 2 (O&M) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJA **** Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Sr. Standin Ms. Pridhi Sandhu, Jr. Standing C Ms. Muskaan Gupta, Advocate for the appellant/Revenue. Mr. Rishab Singla, Advocate for the respondent. **** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) l for the appellant submits that 024 dated 17.09.2024 issued by th netary limits for filing of the appe High Court and SLP/Appeals befo ed and the Circular No.5/2024 has b en taken with the purpose to manag “ 2. As a step towards manag been decided by the Board to revise filing of appeals in Income-tax cases a aforementioned Circular as follows: Sl. No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax
Before Income Tax Appella
Before High Court B AND HARYANA AT H ITA-224-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.11.2024 (CENTRAL) , LUDHIANA . . . . Appellant . . . . Respondent EEV PRAKASH SHARMA AY VASHISTH ng Counsel with Co
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Pabitra Kumar Prusty vs. The Chief Commissioner , CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Innojet Projects Private Limited, Khorda vs. The Joint Commissioner Of State Tax (Appeal) Central Tax And Goods And Services Tax, BhubaneswarOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Ganjam Galaxy Bhapur Barkatulla Street, Ganjam vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Lalu Kumar Bagh vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Koraput Range, KoraputOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Bhanu Metal Industries And Ors vs. Union Of INDIA And OrsCalcutta · 7 Oct 2026