AMAR PRABHU GOYAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS
Facts
The petitioner, Amar Prabhu, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and others. The specific assessment year(s) are not recorded. The petition challenged an order or action, the details of which are not explicitly stated, but the petitioner sought liberty to file a fresh one and challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The matter was heard on April 9, 2026.
Held
The Tribunal (High Court) decided to allow the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action. Furthermore, the petitioner was granted liberty to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the fresh petition. The reasoning provided is that the petitioner sought this liberty, and the court acceded to the request. The operative direction is the dismissal of the present petition as withdrawn with the specified liberties. No issue was expressly left undecided, as the court granted the requested relief.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner should be granted liberty to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action and also to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee's Contention: The learned counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and also to challenge Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Revenue's Contention: The judgment records no specific argument from the revenue, but the court granted the liberty as prayed for.
Sections Cited
147A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE Sr. No. 134 Amar Prabhu Deputy Com Chandigarh a CORAM :
Present :
DEEPAK SIB
L with liberty t also to challe
D
2026 shamsher
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HA u Goyal
Versus mmissioner of Income Tax, and others
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEP HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPI
Mr. Rohit Kaura, Advocate, for (appeared through video confere
Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Senior Stan Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Junior Stand for the Income Tax Department. * * * * * BAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petition to the petitioner to file a fresh o enge therein Section 147A of the Dismissed as withdrawn with lib
Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3027-202 Date of decision : 09.04.20
.…. Petition
..... Responden PAK SIBAL TA BANERJI the petitioner encing). nding Counsel, with ing Counsel, . ner seeks to withdraw this petiti one on the same cause of action e Income Tax Act, 1961. berty as prayed for.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Legend Distilleries PVT. LTD. vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Legend Distilleries PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Scottmen Alco Bev Fillers PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Legend Distilieries PVT LTD. vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Legend Distilleries PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026