H L BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITED vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, LUDHIANA AND ORS

CWP/2210/2026HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01208321202521 July 2026Author: MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL,MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The petitioner, H L Buildwell Private Ltd., filed a writ petition (CWP No. 2210 of 2026) challenging notices dated 12.04.2022 and an appellate order dated 28.10.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-5, Ludhiana. The respondents are the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and others. The case came before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. The parties agreed that the issue in the present petition had already been decided in the petitioner's favor by a Division Bench of the same High Court in a previous judgment.

Held

The High Court held that the issue raised in the present petition stands decided in favor of the petitioner by a recent judgment of a Division Bench of the same Court dated 06.05.2026 in CWP No.37049 of 2025 – H L Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and others. Based on this consensus between the parties, the Court allowed the present petition. Consequently, the impugned notices dated 12.04.2022 and the appellate order dated 28.10.2025, passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-5, Ludhiana, were set aside. The ratio decidendi is that if a matter has been decided by a coordinate bench of the same High Court, subsequent petitions raising identical issues should follow the precedent, leading to the allowance of the petition.

Key Issues

1. Whether the issue raised in the writ petition stands decided by a previous judgment of the High Court? (Question of law). The petitioner contended that the issue has been decided in their favor by a Division Bench of the High Court in a lead case, H L Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and others, decided on 06.05.2026. The revenue, through its learned Senior Standing Counsel, agreed with the petitioner's submission regarding the applicability of the previous judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

( Sr. No. 217 )

CWP No. 2210 of 2026 (O&M)

Date of decision: 21.07.2026

H L Buildwell Private Ltd. .....Petitioner

Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and others .....Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL

Present : Mr. Nikhil Goyal, Advocate and Ms. Ruby, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Varun Issar, Senior Standing Counsel

for the respondent(s)-Income Tax Department.

* * *

DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) (1)

Learned counsel for the parties agree that the issue raised through this petition stands decided in the petitioner’s favour by a recent judgment given by a Division Bench of this Court on 06.05.2026 in a bunch of petitions in which the lead case was CWP No.37049 of 2025 – H L Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and others. (2)

In view of the afore consensus, the present petition is allowed in the light of the law laid down in H L Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.’s case (supra) resulting in the setting aside of the impugned notices, all dated 12.

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →