KCC BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ORS
Facts
The petitioner, KCC Buildcon Private Limited, had income tax dues of Rs.43,61,12,791/- for assessment years 2011-12 to 2021-22. After depositing Rs.8,19,44,555/-, the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (DCIT) stayed the recovery of the balance Rs.35,41,68,236/- on 28.05.2025. Subsequently, for assessment year 2024-25, the petitioner was assessed to a refund of Rs.55,61,41,560/-. The respondent authorities adjusted Rs.35,41,68,236/- of this refund against the previously stayed demand. The petitioner challenged this adjustment through a writ petition before the High Court.
Held
The High Court held that the adjustment of Rs.35,41,68,236/- made by the respondent authorities on 29.05.2025, against the income tax dues for assessment years 2011-12 to 2021-22, was in contravention of the stay order dated 28.05.2025, passed by the DCIT. The Court reasoned that once a stay on recovery was granted, the revenue could not proceed to collect the same amount by way of adjustment against a refund. Therefore, the adjustment could not be sustained. The Court directed that the sum of Rs.35,41,68,236/- be refunded forthwith to the petitioner, along with applicable interest as per law. The petition was allowed in these terms.
Key Issues
1. Whether the adjustment of the refund of Rs.35,41,68,236/- made by the respondent authorities on 29.05.2025, against the income tax dues for assessment years 2011-12 to 2021-22, was valid, given that recovery of these dues had been stayed by the DCIT on 28.05.2025. Assessee's contention: The assessee argued that the adjustment was invalid as it contravened the stay order granted by the DCIT prior to the adjustment. The assessee relied on the principle that a stay order should be respected and not circumvented. Revenue's contention: The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the revenue.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 CWP-26992-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26992-2025 Date of decision: 06.08.2026 Sr. No.152 KCC Buildcon Private Limited …..Petitioner VERSUS Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Others ….Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Nikhil Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Jr. Standing Counsel for the respondent(s)-Income Tax Department. ***** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (ORAL)
For the assessment years 2011-12 to 2021-22, the income tax dues payable by the petitioner to the respondent income tax authorities was a cumulative sum of Rs.43,61,12,791/-. Through separate appeals, the afore demand has been challenged by the petitioner and on deposit of a cumulative sum of Rs.8,19,44,555/- against the aforesaid demand, through an order dated 28.05.2025, passed by the Appellate Authority - Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Gurgaon (for short – DCIT), recovery of the balance amount of Rs.35,41,68,236/- from the petitioner was ordered to be stayed.
In the meanwhile, through assessment order dated 16.04.2025, perta
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. S.G. Fab vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Nithil Agarwal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Navneet Singh vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Chief Secretary, Government Of JharkhandJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026