RINJI ESTATES DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(1) GURGAON AND ANOTHER

CWP/14891/2021HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01069310202118 April 2026Author: MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, Rinji Estates Developers Pvt. Ltd., challenged notices dated March 31, 2021, issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for various assessment years. These notices were dispatched to the petitioner on or after April 1, 2021. The revenue, represented by the Income Tax Officer, Gurgaon, and another respondent, conceded before the Punjab & Haryana High Court that these notices should be treated as notices under Section 148A(b) of the Act, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal. The petitioner's counsel found this concession satisfactory.

Held

The High Court disposed of the petition based on the concession made by the revenue. The revenue conceded that the impugned notices dated March 31, 2021, dispatched to the petitioner on or after April 1, 2021, for the respective assessment years, issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, should be treated as notices under Section 148A(b) of the Act. This concession was made in terms of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Union of India and others vs. Ashish Agarwal (2023) 1 SCC 617. The Court directed the respondent-revenue to proceed from the stage of these notices, in terms of the procedure laid down under Section 148A(b) of the Act. The petitioner was granted liberty to raise all possible pleas and defenses available to it during these proceedings. Any pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of.

Key Issues

1. Whether notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dispatched on or after April 1, 2021, for the relevant assessment years, should be treated as notices under Section 148A(b) of the Act, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India and others vs. Ashish Agarwal (2023) 1 SCC 617? Assessee's Contention: The petitioner, through its senior counsel, accepted the revenue's concession that the impugned notices should be treated as notices under Section 148A(b) of the Act. Revenue's Contention: The revenue conceded that in terms of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Union of India and others vs. Ashish Agarwal (2023) 1 SCC 617, the impugned notices dated March 31, 2021, dispatched to the petitioner on or after April 1, 2021, for the respective assessment years, under Section 148 of the Act, be treated as notices under Section 148A(b) of the Act.

Sections Cited

Section 148, Section 148A(b)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Sr. No. 201(6) CWP-14891-2021 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.04.2026 Rinji Estates Developers Pvt. Ltd.

.…. Petitioner Versus The Income Tax Officer, Gurgaon and another ..... Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI

Present : Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate, and Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Varun Issar, Senior Standing Counsel, for the Income Tax Department. * * * * * Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short-the Act) be treated as notices under Section 148A(b) of the Act.

2.

The above concession satisfies learned senior counsel f

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →