M/S, LOIL CONTINENTAL FOODS LTD. vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Loil Continental Foods Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 31.03.2021, issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for assessment year 2014-15. The notice was dispatched on or after 01.04.2021. The respondent is the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, Ludhiana. The High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh heard the matter. The procedural history involves the issuance of the Section 148 notice, which the petitioner contested.
Held
The High Court held that the revenue's concession, based on the Supreme Court's judgment in Union of India and others vs. Ashish Agarwal (2023) 1 SCC 617, was acceptable. The Court directed that the impugned notice dated 31.03.2021, issued for assessment year 2014-15 and dispatched on or after 01.04.2021, be treated as a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondent-revenue to proceed from the stage of the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act. The petitioner was granted liberty to raise all available pleas and defenses during these proceedings. No issue was expressly left undecided, as the matter was resolved by the concession and subsequent directions.
Key Issues
1. Whether the notice dated 31.03.2021, issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for assessment year 2014-15, dispatched on or after 01.04.2021, should be treated as a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act? (Question of law) Assessee's Contention: The petitioner, through its senior counsel, implicitly argued that the notice should be treated as per the prevailing law, which was influenced by the Supreme Court's decision in Ashish Agarwal. The petitioner's counsel was satisfied with the revenue's concession. Revenue's Contention: The learned counsel for the revenue conceded that in terms of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Union of India and others vs. Ashish Agarwal (2023) 1 SCC 617, the impugned notice dated 31.03.2021, dispatched to the petitioner on or after 01.04.2021, for the assessment year 2014-15, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, should be treated as notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act.
Sections Cited
Section 148, Section 148A(b)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No. 201(112) CWP-4344-2022 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.04.2026 M/s Loil Continental Foods Ltd.
.…. Petitioner Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, Ludhiana and another ..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present : Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate, with
Mr. Abhinav Narang, Advocate, and
Ms. Parnika Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Varun Issar, Senior Standing Counsel, for the Income Tax Department. * * * * * petitioner on or after 01.04.2021, for the assessment year 2014-15, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short-the Act) be treated
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The Lead Factory vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes.Karnataka · 7 Oct 2026
- Dolphin Motor Agency, Cuttack vs. Additional Commissioner Of State Tax (Appeal), Central Zone-Ii, CuttackOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Devendra Singh Kanyal vs. Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 7 Oct 2026
- Trivitron Healthcare Private LTD vs. Deputy Commissioner Division Vi CGST Central Excise Commissionerate BelapurBombay · 7 Oct 2026
- Mr Ca Mukunda vs. Mr. Ca. Shiva Prakash H SKarnataka · 7 Oct 2026