BHUSHAN AIRWAYS SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED vs. DCIT, CEN 1, CHANDIGARH AND ORS
Facts
The petitioner, Bhushan Airways Services Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh challenging a notice dated 31.03.2021, dispatched on or after 01.04.2021, issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2014-15. The respondents were the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and others. The revenue, through its senior standing counsel, conceded that the impugned notice should be treated as a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India and others Vs. Ashish Agarwal (2023) 1 SCC 617. This concession satisfied the petitioner.
Held
The High Court noted that the learned counsel for the revenue conceded that in terms of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Union of India and others Vs. Ashish Agarwal (2023) 1 SCC 617, the impugned notice dated 31.03.2021, dispatched to the petitioner on or after 01.04.2021, for the assessment year 2014-15, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, should be treated as notices under Section 148A(b) of the Act. This concession satisfied the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the present petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondent-revenue to proceed from the stage of the aforementioned notices, in terms of the procedure laid down under Section 148A(b) of the Act. The petitioner was also granted liberty to raise all possible pleas/defences available to it in the course of these proceedings. No issue was expressly left undecided.
Key Issues
1. Whether the notice dated 31.03.2021, dispatched to the petitioner on or after 01.04.2021, for the assessment year 2014-15, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, should be treated as a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India and others Vs. Ashish Agarwal (2023) 1 SCC 617? Assessee's Contention: The petitioner sought to have the notice treated as one under Section 148A(b) of the Act. Revenue's Contention: The revenue conceded that in terms of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Union of India and others Vs. Ashish Agarwal (2023) 1 SCC 617, the impugned notice dated 31.03.2021, dispatched to the petitioner on or after 01.04.2021, for the assessment year 2014-15, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, be treated as notices under Section 148A(b) of the Act.
Sections Cited
Section 148, Section 148A(b)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : April 18, 2026 Bhushan Airways Services Pvt. Ltd. ...... Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CEN- iCHANDIGARH AND OTHERS ...... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI *** Present :- Mr. Vishal Sharma Haritwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Senior Standing Counsel, for the respondent-Income Tax Department.
*** after 01.04.2021, for the assessment year 2014-15, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short- the Act) be treated as notices under Section 148A(b) of the Act.
The above concession satisfies learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the present petition is dispo
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mbd Alchemie Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Asa Corporate Catalyst INDIA Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Cresent Stationers vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii Ward 3 Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Drum Roll Advertising Private Limited Vani Sood vs. Commissioner Of Dgst & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026