HARSH BEDI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ORS
Facts
The petitioner, Harsh Bedi, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated March 31, 2021, issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2015-16. The notice was dispatched on or after April 1, 2021. The respondents are the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana, and others. The case came before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. The revenue conceded that the impugned notice should be treated as a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal.
Held
The High Court noted the concession made by the learned counsel for the revenue. The revenue agreed that in terms of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Union of India and others vs. Ashish Agarwal (2023) 1 SCC 617, the impugned notice dated March 31, 2021, dispatched to the petitioner on or after April 1, 2021, for the assessment year 2015-16, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, should be treated as a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act. This concession satisfied the learned counsel for the petitioner. Consequently, the petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents-revenue to proceed from the stage of the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, following the prescribed procedure. The petitioner was granted liberty to raise all available pleas and defenses during these proceedings.
Key Issues
1. Whether the notice dated March 31, 2021, issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2015-16, dispatched on or after April 1, 2021, should be treated as a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal (2023) 1 SCC 617? (Question of law). Assessee's Contention: The petitioner's counsel was satisfied with the revenue's concession. Revenue's Contention: The revenue conceded that the impugned notice dated March 31, 2021, dispatched to the petitioner on or after April 1, 2021, for the assessment year 2015-16, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, be treated as notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, in terms of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Union of India and others vs. Ashish Agarwal (2023) 1 SCC 617.
Sections Cited
Section 148, Section 148A(b)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No. 279.7 CWP-18669-2021 Date of decision : 30.04.2026 Harsh Bedi
.…. Petitioner Versus Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
Ludhiana and others
..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present : Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel,
Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Advocate, and
Ms. Nikita Garg, Advocate, for the Income Tax Department. * * * * * petitioner on or after 01.04.2021, for the assessment year 2015-16, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short-the Act) be treated as notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act.
The above concession satisfies learned
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Bibhasa Jena vs. The Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar CommissionerateOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- M/S Otd Logistics Express Private Limited vs. The Commissioner CGST Cx And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Sangram Mallik vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Amitabh Samal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Cuttack 1Orissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Atul Kumar vs. The SuperintendentUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026