HARSH BEDI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ORS

CWP/18669/2021HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01086167202130 April 2026Author: MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, Harsh Bedi, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated March 31, 2021, issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2015-16. The notice was dispatched on or after April 1, 2021. The respondents are the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana, and others. The case came before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. The revenue conceded that the impugned notice should be treated as a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal.

Held

The High Court noted the concession made by the learned counsel for the revenue. The revenue agreed that in terms of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Union of India and others vs. Ashish Agarwal (2023) 1 SCC 617, the impugned notice dated March 31, 2021, dispatched to the petitioner on or after April 1, 2021, for the assessment year 2015-16, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, should be treated as a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act. This concession satisfied the learned counsel for the petitioner. Consequently, the petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents-revenue to proceed from the stage of the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, following the prescribed procedure. The petitioner was granted liberty to raise all available pleas and defenses during these proceedings.

Key Issues

1. Whether the notice dated March 31, 2021, issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2015-16, dispatched on or after April 1, 2021, should be treated as a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal (2023) 1 SCC 617? (Question of law). Assessee's Contention: The petitioner's counsel was satisfied with the revenue's concession. Revenue's Contention: The revenue conceded that the impugned notice dated March 31, 2021, dispatched to the petitioner on or after April 1, 2021, for the assessment year 2015-16, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, be treated as notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, in terms of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Union of India and others vs. Ashish Agarwal (2023) 1 SCC 617.

Sections Cited

Section 148, Section 148A(b)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Sr. No. 279.7 CWP-18669-2021 Date of decision : 30.04.2026 Harsh Bedi

.…. Petitioner Versus Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,

Ludhiana and others

..... Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI

Present : Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel,

Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Advocate, and

Ms. Nikita Garg, Advocate, for the Income Tax Department. * * * * * petitioner on or after 01.04.2021, for the assessment year 2015-16, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short-the Act) be treated as notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act.

2.

The above concession satisfies learned

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →