COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I vs. SHYOURAJ SINGH B CHAUHAN
Facts
The assessee, engaged in providing security services, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2007-08 declaring a total income of Rs. 31,18,680. The Assessing Officer (AO) assessed the total income at Rs. 61,06,276, making additions and initiating penalty proceedings. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], who allowed the appeal. The Revenue then appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which dismissed the Revenue's appeal. The Revenue has filed the present appeal before the High Court against the ITAT's order.
Held
The High Court held that the issue concerning the deletion of the addition for late payment of PF/ESIC was concluded by its own prior decision in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation, [2014] 366 ITR 170 (Guj). In that case, it was held that if an assessee fails to credit the employees' contribution to the relevant fund on or before the due date specified in the Explanation to Section 36(1)(va), such amount is not eligible for deduction in computing income under Section 28. Therefore, the question of law was answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. The impugned judgment and order of the ITAT were quashed and set aside. The appeal was allowed.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Appellate Tribunal has substantially erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 29.29 Lacs, which was made on account of late payment of PF/ESIC, and should have been treated as income of the assessee under Section 2(24)(x) and disallowed as a deduction under Section 36(1)(va) due to the late payment? Assessee's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the assessee before the High Court. However, the fact that the CIT(A) allowed the assessee's appeal and the ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal suggests the assessee's position was that the addition was incorrect. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue contended that the late payment of employees' contribution to PF/ESIC should be treated as income under Section 2(24)(x) and is not deductible under Section 36(1)(va) if not paid on or before the due date.
Sections Cited
2(24)(x), 36(1)(va), 28, 143(3), 234B, 234C, 271(1)(c), 260A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
O/TAXAP/311/2014 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 311 of 2014
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.J.THAKER
================================================================ 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ================================================================ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I....Appellant(s) Versus SHYOURAJ SINGH B CHAUHAN....Opponent(s) ================================================================ Appearance: MR M.R. BHATT SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL WITH MRS MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1 NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ===========================================================
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Legend Distilleries PVT. LTD. vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Legend Distilleries PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Scottmen Alco Bev Fillers PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Legend Distilieries PVT LTD. vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026
- Legend Distilleries PVT LTD vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 5 Oct 2026