THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. GUJARAT HOUSING BOARD (GHB)
Facts
The Revenue has filed this Tax Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order of the Appellate Tribunal dated November 16, 2018, for Assessment Year 2012-13. The appeal challenges the Tribunal's decision to set aside the issue of deduction/exemptions under Sections 11 and 12 of the Act. The Revenue contends that the assessee's activities are covered by the provisos to Section 2(15) and thus not entitled to exemption under Section 13(8). The Tribunal had relied on previous High Court decisions concerning the Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority and Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation, finding the Gujarat Housing Board's activities comparable.
Held
The High Court held that the question proposed by the Revenue does not constitute a substantial question of law. The Court noted that the Appellate Tribunal had relied on its own previous decisions in the cases of Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority vs. PCIT (Exemption) and CIT vs. Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation. Furthermore, a coordinate bench of the same High Court had previously dismissed a similar appeal filed by the Revenue against the Gujarat Housing Board, also relying on the AUDA decision. That earlier order had restored the issue to the Assessing Officer for de novo consideration, and the High Court had not interfered with that remand order. Given this precedent and the pendency of the issue before the Supreme Court, the present appeal was dismissed.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and on facts in setting aside the issue of deduction/exemptions u/s. 11 & 12 of the Act, without appreciating that the activities of the assessee authority are covered by the first and second proviso to section 2(15) of the Act and thus not entitled to exemption u/s 11 and 12 as per provisions of section 13(8) of the Act? Assessee's contentions: Not recorded. Revenue's contentions: The Revenue argued that although the Gujarat Housing Board constructs residential houses for weaker sections or backward classes, it ultimately earns business and profit. Therefore, its activities fall within the provisos to Section 2(15) of the Act, disentitling it from exemptions under Sections 11 and 12 as per Section 13(8). The Revenue sought to distinguish the activities from those considered in the cited High Court judgments.
Sections Cited
Section 260-A, Section 11, Section 12, Section 2(15), Section 13(8)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
This Tax Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act, 1961”) is at the instance of the Revenue and is directed against the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal dated 16.11.2018 in ITA No. 3297/Ahd/2016 for the Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The Revenue has proposed the following as the substantial question of law arising in this Tax Appeal : “Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and on facts in setting aside the issue of deduction / exemptions u/s. 11 & 12 of the Act, without appreciatin
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The Lead Factory vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes.Karnataka · 7 Oct 2026
- Dolphin Motor Agency, Cuttack vs. Additional Commissioner Of State Tax (Appeal), Central Zone-Ii, CuttackOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Devendra Singh Kanyal vs. Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 7 Oct 2026
- Trivitron Healthcare Private LTD vs. Deputy Commissioner Division Vi CGST Central Excise Commissionerate BelapurBombay · 7 Oct 2026
- Mr Ca Mukunda vs. Mr. Ca. Shiva Prakash H SKarnataka · 7 Oct 2026