PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 vs. TORRENT PVT. LTD.

TAXAP/279/2019HC GujaratGJHC24036491201915 July 2019Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.C. RAO2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The Revenue has filed this Tax Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad 'C' Bench. The appeal pertains to Assessment Year 2003-04 and concerns the deletion of a penalty of Rs. 4,84,75,000/- levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The ITAT had previously dropped contempt proceedings against the assessee in ITA No. 1163/Ahd/2014 by an order dated 13.04.2018. The Revenue had challenged the ITAT's order in the contempt proceedings before the High Court in Tax Appeal No. 1225/2018, which was dismissed.

Held

The High Court held that the Appellate Tribunal had not erred in deleting the penalty of Rs. 4,84,75,000/- levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The reasoning was based on the fact that the ITAT had previously granted relief to the assessee in contempt proceedings (ITA No. 1163/Ahd/2014) by dropping them. Furthermore, the Revenue's challenge to the ITAT's order in those contempt proceedings before the High Court in Tax Appeal No. 1225/2018 had been dismissed. Therefore, in light of the prior favourable orders for the assessee and the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal against those orders, the present appeal by the Revenue was also dismissed. The operative direction was the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and on facts in upholding the decision of the CIT(A) deleting the penalty of Rs. 4,84,75,000/- levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? Assessee's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the assessee. However, the Tribunal's decision to delete the penalty was based on its earlier order in contempt proceedings where relief was granted to the assessee. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue argued that the Appellate Tribunal erred in deleting the penalty. The basis for the Tribunal's decision was its prior order in contempt proceedings (ITA No. 1163/Ahd/2014) where contempt proceedings were dropped. The Revenue's challenge to this earlier order in Tax Appeal No. 1225/2018 was dismissed by the High Court.

Sections Cited

Section 260A, Section 271(1)(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

C/TAXAP/279/2019 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 279 of 2019 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA

and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.C. RAO

========================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India or any order made thereunder ? ========================================================== PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 Versus TORRENT PVT. LTD. ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.C. RAO

Date : 15/07/2019

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →