M/S LALI CONSTRUCTION CO. vs. THE ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court, in its decision dated 04.08.2014, disposed of the appeal by following its own prior judgment in ITA No.126 of 2001 (M/s Lali Construction Co. Patiala vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax cum Assessing Officer, Patiala) decided on 20.11.2007. On the issue of depreciation, the Court held that the assessee is entitled to deduction on account of depreciation from receipts while applying a net profit rate on gross receipts, citing Division Benches' decisions in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Chopra Bros. India (P) Limited and Girdhari Lal v Commissioner of Income Tax. Regarding interest paid on borrowed capital, the Court held that it is not deductible when a net profit rate is applied, as the application of such a rate is deemed to take into consideration all factors and deductions under Section 29 of the Act. This issue was decided against the assessee. On the reasonableness of the 10% net profit rate, the Court found no illegality or perversity in the ITAT's estimation, noting that the ITAT had followed its practice in similar cases and that the rate appeared just and reasonable. Thus, the appeal was disposed of in terms of the prior judgment.
What were the facts?
The assessee, M/s Lali Construction Co., a partnership firm engaged in civil construction, filed its return for Assessment Year 1990-91 showing a total income of ₹4,72,000. The Assessing Officer (AO), invoking Section 145(2), rejected the books of account and applied a net profit rate of 12.5% on gross receipts, leading to an addition of approximately ₹1,20,000. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] partly allowed the appeal, reducing the net profit rate to 10% but disallowed depreciation and interest. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the assessee's further appeal. The assessee then filed an appeal before the High Court under Section 260A against the ITAT's order.
What were the issues?
The High Court had to decide the following substantial questions of law: 1. Whether the ITAT was justified in not allowing depreciation from the net profit rate applied, considering Circular No. 29 DCXLX7F No.47/239/65 ITC dated 31.3.1965? 2. Whether depreciation and interest are allowable deductions from net profits even when total income is calculated by applying a net profit rate? 3. Whether there was a reasonable basis for the ITAT to apply a net profit rate of 10% of gross receipts? Assessee's contentions (implied from the questions and the High Court's reference to prior judgments): The assessee contended that depreciation and interest should be allowed as deductions even when a net profit rate is applied. The assessee also likely argued for a reasonable basis for the net profit rate applied. Revenue's contentions: The revenue's contentions are not explicitly recorded in the provided text, but their position is reflected in the AO's and ITAT's orders which disallowed depreciation and interest and applied a net profit rate.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 04.08.2014 M/s Lali Construction Co. ……Appellant Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-cum-Assessing Officer, Patiala (Punjab) and another …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH Present: Mr.K.L.Goyal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondents.
Ajay Kumar Mittal,J.
This appeal has been preferred by the appellant-assessee under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, “the Act”) against the order dated 18.8.2000, passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench (in short, “the Tribunal') in ITA No.732/CHD/93, for the assessment year 1990-91. On 22.4.2003, the appeal was admitted to consider following substantial questions of law:- i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned ITAT is justified not to allow the depreciation and interest from the flat rate of net profit applied by him, in view of Circular No.29 DCXLX7F No.47/239/65 ITC dated 31.3.1965? ii) Whether the depreciation and interest are allowable integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh deductions from the net profits even if total income is calculated by applying net profit rate? iv) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, there are any reasonable basis for applying a net profit rate of 10% of gross receipts by the Tribunal?
A few facts relevant for the decision of the controversy involved as narrated in the appeal may be noticed. The assessee is a partnership firm doing its business at Patiala in Punjab State. It is engaged in the business of civil construction work relating to telecom authorities. For the assessment year 1990-91, the appellant firm filed its return of income showing total income at ` 4,72,000/-. The case was taken up for scrutiny and assessment was framed vide order dated 18.10.1991, Annexure P.
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax cum Assessing Officer assessed the assessee to a total income of ` 6,00,861/-. The Assessing officer rejected the books of account on certain grounds by applying section 145(2) of the Act. The Assessing officer applied net profit rate of 12.5% on the gross receipts of the assessee making an addition of about ` 1,20,000/- in the total income. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee filed appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]. Vide order dated 17.2.1993, Annexure P.3, the CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal, allowing rate of 10% net profit without permitting depreciation and interest. The assessee filed further appeal before the Tribunal. Vide order dated 18.8.2000, impugned herein,the Tribunal dismissed the appeal. Hence the instant appeal by the appellant- assessee.
We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record.
The matter is no longer res integra. This Court while dealing integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh with similar issues in ITA No.126 of 2001 (M/s Lali Construction Co. Officer, Patiala) decided on 20.11.2007, recorded as under:- “The points raised in this appeal may be categorized into following three issues: a) Whether, while applying net profit rate to the gross receipts, the assessee is entitled for deduction on account of depreciation allowance from such receipts? b) Whether interest paid on the borrowed capital is to be deducted from gross receipts while applying net profit rate? c) Whether the net profit rate of 10% applied by the ITAT in the present case is just and reasonable? No.72 of 1995 (Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala vs. M/s Gian Chand Labour Contractors Khanauri District Sangrur) decided on 6.11.2007 wherein it has been held that application of net profit rate takes into consideration all factors and the deductions which are referred to under Section 29 of the Act are deemed to have been taken into consideration while making integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh such estimate. Accordingly, the said issue is decided against the assessee. Referring to the third point it deserves to be mentioned that the Assessing officer had applied net profit rate of 12.5%. On appeal, the CIT(A) having regard to the fact that there were certain defects in the wages registers maintained by the appellant, estimated the net profit at 9% of the receipts i.e. of ` 75,98,134/-. However, the ITAT estimated the net profit rate of 10% of the receipts and further noticed that the said appellate Tribunal in similar cases had been adopting the net profit rate of 10%. No illegality or perversity could be pointed out warranting interference by this Court. The net profit rate of 10% adopted by the ITAT in the facts and circumstances of the instant case appears to be just and reasonable. Accordingly, the third issue is decided against the assessee.
In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of in the same terms as in M/s Lali Construction Co.’s case (supra). (Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge August 04, 2014 (Fateh Deep Singh) Judge ‘gs’
integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
More judgments on Section 145(2)
- Wellness Forever Healthtech Private… vs DCIT Circle 15(3)(1), MumbaiITA 266/MUM/2026[AY 2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026
- ACIT-15(3)(1), Mumbai vs Wellness Forever Healthtech Private…ITA 1971/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Devipriya Enterprises, Pune vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2(2), PuneITA 2834/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(6), Surat vs Ghevarchand Bhanwarlal Pamecha, SuratITA 181/SRT/2025[2014]Status: Disposed6 Aug 2026
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(6), Surat vs Ghevarchand Bhanwarlal Pamecha, SuratITA 180/SRT/2025[2013]Status: Disposed6 Aug 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dikshant Nim vs. Union Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Pankaj Patil vs. Branch Manager Hdfc BankMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Rudra Pratap Singh vs. The Union Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026