PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL LUDHIANA vs. M/S SEL MANUFACTURING CO LTD PLOT NO 273-74, DHANDARI KALAN G.T. ROAD LUDHIANA
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the tax effect in the appeal was Rs.35,89,330/-. The learned counsel for the appellant (Revenue) submitted that he had instructions to withdraw the appeal in view of Circular No.9 of 2024 dated September 17, 2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, CBDT, Government of India. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. Any pending applications were also disposed of as well.
What were the facts?
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I (Central), Gurgaon (the Revenue) filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order dated February 7, 2017, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Division Bench, Chandigarh, in ITA No.76/Chd/2012. The appeal was filed against M/s SEL Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Ludhiana (the assessee). The tax effect in dispute was Rs.35,89,330/-.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue should be withdrawn in view of the tax effect and CBDT Circular No.9 of 2024 dated September 17, 2024? (Question of procedure/administrative policy) Contentions: Assessee: No arguments recorded. Revenue: Submitted that the tax effect is Rs.35,89,330/- and has instructions to withdraw the appeal in view of CBDT Circular No.9 of 2024.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
204-d IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
ITA-491-2017
Date of Decision: February 03, 2025
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-I (Central), Gurgaon .....Appellant
Versus
M/s SEL Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Ludhiana
..... Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN
Present: Mr. Varun Issar, Sr. Standing counsel for the appellant.
Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate with Ms. Parnika Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
**** LISA GILL, J.
Present appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging order dated 07.02.2017 passed by learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Division Bench, Chandigarh in ITA No.76/Chd/2012. 2. Learned counsel for appellant submits that as the tax effect is only Rs.35,89,330/- he has instructions to withdraw this appeal in view of circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024 issued by Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, CBDT, Government of India.
Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of as well.
(LISA GILL)
JUDGE
(ALOK JAIN) February 03, 2025
JUDGE Rts Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RITU SHARMA 2025.02.05 09:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026