ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. VISTEON TECHNICAL AND SERVICES CENTRE PVT LTD
What were the facts?
The High Court was hearing a writ appeal against a Single Judge's order that allowed a writ petition challenging reassessment notices and orders under the Income Tax Act. The appeal was filed by the Revenue.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court set aside the Single Judge's order and remitted the matter back. This was done in light of a Supreme Court order that addressed similar issues arising from amendments to the Income Tax Act, particularly the insertion of Section 147A.
What were the issues?
The primary issue revolved around the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated under the Income Tax Act, particularly concerning the role of different officers and the retrospective effect of subsequent amendments.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 148,Section 148A,Section 147,Section 147A,Section 279,Section 280,Section 281
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25113-DB WA No. 484 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MAY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT APPEAL NO. 484 OF 2026 (T-IT) BETWEEN:
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1)(1) BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095. 2. JOINT /ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE 1(1) BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. RAVI RAJ Y.V., SR. STANDING COUNSEL A/W SRI. DILIP M., STANDING COUNSEL)
AND:
VISTEON TECHNICAL AND SERVICES CENTRE PVT LTD REP. BY DIRECTOR, MR. NIKHIL AGARWAL BLOCK A-4 6TH FLOOR GATEWAY OFFICE PARKS SEZ GST ROAD CHENNAI – 600063. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP NO.29737/2025 (T-IT) DATED 10/10/2025 AND ETC.
THIS WRIT APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, T
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 638/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Khubchandani, Raipur vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), RaipurITA 437/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Kishorbhai C Bhagtani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 999/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Bibhasa Jena vs. The Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar CommissionerateOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- M/S Otd Logistics Express Private Limited vs. The Commissioner CGST Cx And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Sangram Mallik vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Amitabh Samal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Cuttack 1Orissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Atul Kumar vs. The SuperintendentUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026