COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. ANURADHABEN H. BACHKANIWALA

ITA/284/1999HC GujaratGJHC24025023199928 September 1999Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.C.PATEL,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What were the facts?

The Commissioner of Income-tax, Surat, filed an application under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, requesting the High Court to direct the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) to refer a question of law. The question concerned the ITAT's deletion of additions of Rs. 3,78,707 and Rs. 40,000 made by the Assessing Officer during block periods, based on an inference drawn from seized materials. The High Court considered a previous decision of its own in the case of N.R. PAPER & BOARDS LTD. reported in 234 ITR page 733. The High Court had previously dealt with a similar question in ITA No. 266 of 1999.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court rejected the Commissioner of Income-tax's application under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court referred to its own prior decision in ITA No. 266 of 1999, which covered the same question raised in this application. By virtue of that prior decision, the High Court found no reason to direct the ITAT to make a reference. Therefore, the application was rejected, and the rule was discharged without any order as to costs. The specific reasoning of the ITAT that led to the deletion of the additions is not detailed in this judgment, nor is the ratio decidendi of the cited case explicitly stated, other than that it governed the present matter.

What were the issues?

The Tribunal was asked to decide whether it was justified in deleting additions of Rs. 3,78,707 and Rs. 40,000 made by the Assessing Officer during block periods, based on an inference from seized materials. The Commissioner of Income-tax argued that the ITAT's deletion was not justified. The assessee's arguments are not recorded in the judgment. The question of law revolves around the interpretation of the provisions related to additions based on inferences from seized materials, specifically concerning the validity of the ITAT's decision to delete such additions.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 256(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

INCOME TAX APPLICATION No 284 of 1999

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.C.PATEL and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?

4.

Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5.

Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO 1 to 5 No

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 256(2)

All 149 judgments and leading authorities on Section 256(2) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →