SURESHCHANDRA A SHAH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court, per Mr. Justice A.R. Dave, declined to answer the question referred to it. This decision was based on the submission by the applicant's counsel that they had instructions not to press for the Reference. The court accepted this submission and proceeded to dispose of the Reference accordingly. The principle derived is that if a party requesting a reference to the High Court subsequently decides not to press it, the High Court will not adjudicate on the merits of the question referred. The Reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.
What were the facts?
This matter concerns an Income Tax Reference No. 136 of 1987 before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad. The applicant is Sureshchandra A. Shah, and the respondent is the Commissioner of Income Tax. The judgment was delivered on July 31, 2001, by a division bench comprising Mr. Justice A.R. Dave and Mr. Justice D.A. Mehta. The applicant's advocate, Mr. Manish J. Shah, informed the court that he had instructions from the applicant not to press for the Reference. Consequently, the court declined to answer the question referred to it.
What were the issues?
The High Court was asked to decide a question of law referred to it by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The specific question referred is not detailed in the provided text. However, the core issue before the High Court was whether to answer the referred question. The applicant, through their counsel, stated they did not wish to press the Reference. The revenue's position is not explicitly recorded, but the court's action implies they did not object to the Reference being disposed of without an answer. The applicant's stance was to withdraw their request for the court's determination on the referred question.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 136 of 1987
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?
To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?
Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026