COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. GUJARAT STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION

ITR/83/1987HC GujaratGJHC24011816198720 August 2001Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT S. SHAH,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA3 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What were the facts?

This case concerns an Income Tax Reference before the High Court of Gujarat. The reference was made at the instance of both the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax) and the assessee (Gujarat State Warehousing Corporation). The assessment years involved are 1973-74 to 1975-76 and 1977-78 and 1978-79. The core of the dispute revolves around the assessee's entitlement to certain interest payments under the Income Tax Act, 1961, in relation to advance tax payments and self-assessment tax payments. The High Court heard arguments from both sides and considered various High Court and Supreme Court decisions.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court answered all three questions in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. For the first issue, regarding interest under section 244(1A) on interest payments under sections 215, 217, and 220(2), the Court found no reason not to agree with the view taken by the Madras, Madhya Pradesh, and Kerala High Courts in the cited cases, thus holding the assessee entitled to the interest. For the second issue, concerning interest under section 214 on advance tax payments, the Court agreed that the matter was covered by the Supreme Court's decision in Modi Industries Ltd. vs. CIT, entitling the assessee to the interest. Similarly, for the third issue, concerning interest under section 244(1A)/214 on tax paid under section 140A, the Court found no reason to take a different view from the Supreme Court's decision in Modi Industries Ltd. vs. CIT and the subsequent High Court decisions, thus holding the assessee entitled to the interest. The reference was disposed of accordingly.

What were the issues?

The Tribunal had to decide three questions referred at the instance of the Revenue and the assessee: 1. Whether the assessee is entitled to interest under section 244(1A) in respect of interest payments under sections 215, 217, and 220(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for assessment years 1973-74 to 1975-76. The assessee contended that the issue was concluded in its favour by decisions of the Madras, Madhya Pradesh, and Kerala High Courts in CIT vs. Needle Industries Pvt. Ltd., CIT vs. Sardar Balwant Singh Gujrat, and CIT vs. Ambat Echukutty Menon, respectively. The Revenue's arguments are not recorded. 2. Whether the assessee is entitled to interest under section 214 on advance tax payments for assessment years 1977-78 and 1978-79. Both parties agreed that this question was covered by the Apex Court's decision in Modi Industries Ltd. vs. CIT in favour of the assessee. 3. Whether the assessee is entitled to interest under section 244(1A)/214 on payment of tax made under section 140A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for assessment years 1977-78 and 1978-79. The assessee argued that this was concluded by the Apex Court's decision in Modi Industries Ltd. vs. CIT, as explained by the Punjab & Haryana High Court in CIT vs. Hansa Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and the Karnataka High Court in CIT vs. NGEF Ltd. The Revenue's arguments are not recorded.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 244(1A),Section 215,Section 217,Section 220(2),Section 214,Section 140A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 83 of 1987

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA

============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?

4.

Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5.

Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 215

All 29 judgments and leading authorities on Section 215 →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →