COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. YASINBHAI ISMAILBHAI MANSURI

ITR/131/1987HC GujaratGJHC24011864198703 September 2001Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT S. SHAH,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA3 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What were the facts?

The Revenue (Commissioner of Income-tax) has filed these Income Tax References (ITR Nos. 131/1987 and 294/1987) challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal). The Tribunal had decided in favour of the assessees, Yasinbhai Ismailbhai Mansuri and Rafiqbhai Ismailbhai Mansuri, for assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77. The dispute pertains to the applicability of Section 60 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding the addition of a 20% share income from M/s. Graduate Picker Marks in the hands of the assessees. It also concerns whether a trust was revocable and the applicability of Sections 61, 63(a)(i), or 63(a)(iii) of the Act. The High Court noted that the Revenue's counsel fairly pointed out a previous High Court decision on similar issues.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the Tribunal was correct in its findings. Following its own unreported decision dated 1/8/1996 in Income Tax Reference No. 116/88 (along with ITR No. 118/88), which in turn relied on the cases of Sunil J. Kinariwala vs. C.I.T. (211 ITR 127) and C.I.T. vs. Prashant J. Kinariwala (211 ITR 393), the Court ruled that the 20% share in the firm had to be assessed in the hands of the trust, not the assessees. Consequently, the provisions of Section 60 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, were not applicable, and the addition of the 20% share income in the hands of the assessees could not be confirmed. Furthermore, the Court affirmed the Tribunal's finding that the trust was not revocable, and therefore, the provisions of Sections 61, 63(a)(i), or 63(a)(iii) of the Act were not applicable. The Tribunal's order setting aside the orders of the Income-tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was upheld. The Court answered all three referred questions in the affirmative, in favour of the assessees and against the Revenue.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, in law and on facts, the appellant (Revenue) is right in holding that the provisions of Section 60 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, were not applicable and the addition of a 20% share income from M/s. Graduate Picker Marks in the hands of the assessee could not be confirmed? 2. Whether, the Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that the trust was not revocable and the provisions of Sections 61, 63(a)(i) or 63(a)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, were not applicable? 3. Whether, in law and on facts, the Tribunal is right in setting aside the order made by the Income-tax Officer confirmed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner? Assessee's Contentions: The judgment does not record specific contentions made by the assessees. However, it is implied they supported the Tribunal's decision. The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions for assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77. Revenue's Contentions: The Revenue contended that Section 60 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was applicable, and therefore, the 20% share income from M/s. Graduate Picker Marks should be added to the assessee's income. They also argued that the trust was revocable and thus Sections 61, 63(a)(i), or 63(a)(iii) were applicable, justifying the setting aside of the lower authorities' orders.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 60,Section 61,Section 63(a)(i),Section 63(a)(iii)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 131 of 1987 WITH INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 294 of 1987

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA

============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?

4.

Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5.

Whether it is to be circulated to the Civ

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 60

All 68 judgments and leading authorities on Section 60 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →