COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX vs. O.N.G.C.

ITA/50/2000HC UttarakhandUKHC01025108200301 July 2004Author: OTHER4 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What were the facts?

The appeal by the Revenue is against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Year 1987-88. The respondent, M/s Troods Shipping Corp. Ltd., is a non-resident foreign company, and ONGC, Dehradun, was assessed as its agent. ONGC had a tax-protected contract with the respondent. The core dispute concerns whether income determined on a notional basis under Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, should be grossed up under Section 195A of the Act. The ITAT had ruled against the Revenue, leading to this appeal.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. It ruled that Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is a self-contained code for the computation of deemed profits for non-resident companies engaged in oil exploration activities. The Court found no merit in the Revenue's argument that Section 195A should be applied for multiple-stage grossing up. The reasoning was that Section 44BB falls under Chapter IV (Computation of Business Income), while Section 195A falls under Chapter XVII (Collection and Recovery of Tax). Therefore, Section 195A cannot be used to augment the income computed under Section 44BB. The Court emphasized that Section 195A is primarily for TDS purposes and does not make a receipt chargeable to tax if it otherwise isn't. The benefit received by the assessee was considered to be Rs. 200/- and the dispute was only regarding the valuation of this benefit, not its taxability. The Court affirmed that the value of the benefit remains constant, irrespective of the contract type.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the income determined on a notional basis in accordance with section 44BB of the I.T. Act, 1961, was not liable to be grossed up under section 195A of the I.T. Act? Assessee's contentions: The assessee argued that Section 44BB is a complete code for computing deemed profits from oil exploration and that Section 195A, dealing with collection and recovery of tax, does not apply to the computation of income under Section 44BB. The value of the benefit received by the assessee remains constant regardless of whether the contract is protected or not. Revenue's contentions: The Revenue contended that in the case of Tax Protected Contracts, Section 195A is attracted, entitling the Department to compute the deemed profits by applying the method of multiple-stage grossing up of income.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 44BB,Section 195A,Section 260A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Assessment Year 1987-88

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL

I.T.A. No. 44 of 2001 (Old No. 50/2000)

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut and another

……… Appellants Versus O.N.G.C., Dehradun As agent of M/s Troods Shipping Corp. Ltd. ……… Respondent

Mr. S.K. Posti, learned Advocate for Income Tax Department.

Hon’ble P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon’ble P.C. Pant, J.

1.

This is an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax, 1961 filed by the Revenue against the judgment and order dated 12.7.1999 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in I.T.A.T. No. 904/Del/93. 2. M/s Troods Shipping Corpn. Ltd.,, respondent is a non-resident foreign company. The assessment was made on ONGC as agent of the respondent. The ONGC had entered into a tax protected contract with the respondent.

3.

The question raised before us is as follows:-

“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the income determined on notional basis in accordance with section 44BB of I.T. Act, 1961, was not liable to be grossed up u/s 195-A of the I.T. Act?”

4.

Heard

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 44BB

All 385 judgments and leading authorities on Section 44BB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →