THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX and ORS vs. READING and BATES EXPLORATION

ITA/31/2003HC UttarakhandUKHC01006233200320 July 2004Author: OTHER5 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What were the facts?

The appeal by the Revenue concerns Assessment Year 1993-1994. The assessee, Mr. W.W. Woods, is a non-resident technician employed by Reading & Bates Exploration Company, which executed contracts in India. The assessee derived income from 'salaries' during his employment. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) had passed an order dated 21.08.2001 in ITA Nos. 348/Del/1996, which is under challenge. The procedural history involves the Revenue filing an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the ITAT's order.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the salary paid for the 'off period' outside India is taxable in India. The Court reasoned that the 'on' and 'off' periods form an integral part of the contract, which is for an alternating time schedule. Even if the 'off' period was a standby arrangement or involved training, it had a nexus with the services rendered in India, making the assessee mentally and physically fit for hazardous work on oil rigs. The payment for the 'off' period was thus income earned in India under Section 9(1)(ii). The Court noted that the employer paid the entire salary from Indian operations, indicating the parties' intention. Regarding free boarding facilities, the Court held that for hazardous and arduous work on the rig, free food and beverages are a necessity, not a luxury or perquisite, and their value cannot be added to the assessee's income. Therefore, the first question was answered in favour of the Revenue, and the second question in favour of the assessee.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances, the ITAT was legally correct in holding that salary paid to the assessee for the 'off period' outside India was not chargeable to Indian Income Tax under Section 9(1)(ii) of the I.T. Act, 1961, especially when the ITAT itself had previously held such 'off period' salary to be taxable in India in multiple prior decisions (citing specific ITA numbers and dates)? (Question of law) 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances, the ITAT was legally correct in holding that free boarding facilities provided by the employer at the rig in high seas could not be construed as a perquisite? (Question of law) Assessee's contentions: Not explicitly recorded for either issue. Revenue's contentions: For issue 1, the Revenue argued that the 'off period' salary is taxable in India, citing the ITAT's own previous contradictory rulings and the integrated nature of the contract. For issue 2, the Revenue's contention is not explicitly recorded.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260A,Section 9(1)(ii),Section 4,Section 5(2),Section 2(45)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

2004:UHC:2054

Assessment Year 1993-1994

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL

Income Tax Appeal No. 31 of 2003 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Dehradun and another

............. Appellants

Versus

Reading & Bates Exploration Co., As agent of Mr. W.W. Woods, New Delhi

............... Respondent

Mr. S.K. Posti, learned counsel for the Tax Department. Ms. Krishi Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent.

Date: 20.07.2004

Hon'ble P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon'ble P.C. Pant, J.

1.

This is an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 filed by the Revenue against the judgment and order dated 21.08.2001 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in I.T.A. Nos. 348/Del/1996. 2. Mr. W.W. Woods, respondent is a non-resident foreign technician employed by a foreign company, Reading & Bates Exploration Company which, in the year under consideration, executed contracts in India. During the year consideration, respondent was in employment of this company and thus derived income from 'salaries' from it.

3.

The questions raised before us are as follows:-

QUESTIONS:

1.

Whether on t

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 9(1)(ii)

All 117 judgments and leading authorities on Section 9(1)(ii) →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →