C I T vs. MOOL CHAND
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that appeals filed by the revenue raising a similar question of law had already been dismissed by the Court vide a judgment dated 26.3.2008 in ITA No.490 of 2007 and other connected matters. Consequently, the Court held that no substantial question of law survived for consideration in the present appeal. The Court declined to entertain the appeal, finding it to be without merit and accordingly dismissed it. The specific reasoning of the ITAT that led to the original decision is not detailed in this High Court judgment, as the High Court's decision is based on its prior dismissal of similar appeals.
What were the facts?
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad (the revenue) filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, against an order dated 29.3.2007 passed by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'I', in ITA No.2769/Del/2005. The appeal pertains to the assessment year 2002-03 and concerns the respondent, Shri Mool Chand, HUF. The revenue's appeal challenges the Tribunal's decision regarding the accrual and taxation of interest on pending litigation.
What were the issues?
1. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble ITAT is right in holding that if litigation was pending before a Court and had not attained finality, interest would not accrue and could be subjected to tax only when it was finally determined? Assessee's contentions: Not recorded in the judgment. Revenue's contentions: The revenue contended that the ITAT erred in its finding that interest does not accrue and is not taxable until litigation attains finality. The revenue's appeal raises this as a substantial question of law.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 28.3.2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-Faridabad ......Appellant Versus Shri Mool Chand, HUF, s/o Sh. Narain Singh, Village Jharsaintly, Ballabgarh ......Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the appellant-revenue. * * * Rakesh Kumar Garg, J .
The revenue has filed the present appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) against the order dated 29.3.2007 passed by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'I', in ITA No.2769/Del/2005 for the assessment year 2002-03 raising the following substantial question of law:- “Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble ITAT is right in holding that if the litigation was pending before a Court and had not attained finality, interest would not accrue and could be subjected to tax only when it was finally determined?”
The appeals of the revenue raising the similar question of law as raised in this appeal have already been dismissed by this Court vide judgement dated 26.3.2008 passed in ITA No.490 of 2007 and other connected matters.
-2-
In the light of the above fact, no substantial question of law survives for our consideration in this appeal and accordingly, we decline to entertain the present appeal. Hence, this appeal is without any merit and the same is dismissed.
(RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 28.3. 2008 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) ps
JUDGE
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
