C I T vs. VED PAL
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court declined to entertain the appeal, stating that no substantial question of law survived for consideration. This was because the Court had already dismissed similar appeals raising the identical question of law in a previous judgment dated 26.3.2008 in ITA No.490 of 2007 and other connected matters. Consequently, the present appeal was found to be without merit and was dismissed. The specific reasoning of the ITAT on the taxability of interest during pending litigation was not elaborated upon by the High Court, as the appeal was disposed of on procedural grounds based on precedent.
What were the facts?
The revenue, Commissioner of Income-tax-Faridabad, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, against an order dated 29.3.2007 passed by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench 'I'. The appeal pertained to assessment year 2002-03 and concerned the respondent, Sh. Ved Pal, HUF. The core of the dispute revolved around whether interest could be taxed if litigation regarding its accrual was still pending and had not attained finality. The High Court noted that similar appeals with the same question of law had already been dismissed by it.
What were the issues?
1. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble ITAT is right in holding that if the litigation was pending before a Court and had not attained finality, interest would not accrue and could be subjected to tax only when it was finally determined? Assessee's contention: The ITAT held that interest would not accrue and could only be taxed upon final determination if litigation regarding its accrual was pending. Revenue's contention: The revenue challenged this finding, arguing that interest should be taxable even if litigation was ongoing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 10.4.2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-Faridabad ......Appellant Versus Sh. Ved Pal, HUF, s/o Sh. Likhi Ram, Village Jharsaintly, Ballabgarh, Faridabad ......Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the appellant-revenue. * * * Rakesh Kumar Garg, J .
The revenue has filed the present appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) against the order dated 29.3.2007 passed by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'I' in ITA No.2785/Del/2005 for the assessment year 2002-03 raising the following substantial question of law:- “Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble ITAT is right in holding that if the litigation was pending before a Court and had not attained finality, interest would not accrue and could be subjected to tax only when it was finally determined?”
The appeals of the revenue raising the similar question of law as raised in this appeal have already been dismissed by this Court vide -2- judgement dated 26.3.2008 passed in ITA No.490 of 2007 and other connected matters.
In the light of the above fact, no substantial question of law survives for our consideration in this appeal and accordingly, we decline to entertain the present appeal. Hence, this appeal is without any merit and the same is dismissed.
(RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE April 10, 2008
(SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) ps
JUDGE
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
