IMPROVEMENT TRUST ABOHAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

PDF · subscribers
ITA/140/2015HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01109765201521 September 2015Author: MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA,MRS JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court observed that a similar issue had come before it in ITA No. 73 of 2013 (Improvement Trust, Bathinda v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Amritsar), wherein the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication. In that case, the Tribunal was directed to decide the issue keeping in view the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act inserted w.e.f. April 1, 2009, with reference to the provisions of the 1922 Act, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties. Following this precedent, the High Court set aside the ITAT's order dated December 9, 2013, and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal is to consider the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act inserted w.e.f. April 1, 2009, in conjunction with the provisions of the 1922 Act, after hearing both parties. The Court explicitly stated that its observations were not an expression of opinion on the merits of the case and directed the Tribunal to decide the matter expeditiously.

What were the facts?

The appellant, Improvement Trust, Abohar, constituted under the Punjab Town Improvement Trust Act, 1922, had its income exempt under Section 10(20A) until Assessment Year 2002-03. Following the omission of this section, the Trust was granted registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, effective from June 12, 2003, on the directions of the Tribunal. The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT), Bathinda, cancelled this registration on February 18, 2013, citing that the Trust's income was taxable from April 1, 2003, due to its engagement in business, trade, and commerce, particularly in light of the amended Section 2(15) effective April 1, 2009. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the CIT's order. The Trust appealed to the High Court against the ITAT's order.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in view of the legal provisions, the ITAT Amritsar was justified in confirming the CIT Bathinda's order cancelling the registration of the appellant-Trust under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the grounds of its carrying out activities in accordance with statutes, thereby holding it to be engaged in activities of trade, business, or commerce with a profit motive? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT Amritsar was justified in cancelling the registration of the appellant-Trust under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, retrospectively and holding the appellant liable to pay tax from April 1, 2003? Assessee's contention: The assessee argued that the matter should be remanded to the Tribunal to adjudicate whether its activities were 'charitable' in nature, even after the insertion of the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act w.e.f. April 1, 2009, specifically for assessment years 2009-10 onwards. The assessee relied on the provisions of the 1922 Act. Revenue's contention: The learned counsel for the revenue supported the order passed by the Tribunal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260A,Section 12AA,Section 10(20A),Section 2(15)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 140 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.9.2015 Improvement Trust, Abohar ....Appellant. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Amritsar ...Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN.

1.

Whether the Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. K.L. Goyal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Denesh Goyal, Advocate for the respondent. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.

1.

Delay in refiling the appeal is condoned.

2.

This appeal has been preferred by the assessee under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) against the order dated 9.12.2013 (Annexure A-6) passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”) in ITA No. 320(ASR)/2013, claiming the following substantial questions of law:- i. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in view of the legal provisions GURBACHAN SINGH 2015.10.07 16:01 authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh -2- the ITAT Amritsar was justified in confirming the order of the CIT Bathinda in cancelling the registration of the appellant- Trust u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the grounds of its carrying out the activities in accordance with statutes and thereby holding it to be carrying out activities of trade, business or commerce with a profit motive? ii. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the ITAT Amritsar was justified in cancelling the registration of the appellant-Trust u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 from retrospective effect and holding that the appellant is liable to pay tax w.e.f. 1.04.2003?

3.

The facts, in short, necessary for adjudication of the instant appeal as narrated therein are that the appellant-Trust was constituted under the Punjab Town Improvement Trust Act, 1922 (for brevity, "the 1922 Act"). Income of the Trust was exempt under section 10(20A) of the Act upto assessment year 2002-03. However, the said Section was omitted by Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f 2003. The Trust was granted registration under Section 12AA of the Act w.e.f. 12.6.2003 on the directions of the Tribunal issued in misc. application vide order dated 4.3.2010 (Annexure A-1). The Commissioner of Income Tax, Bathinda (CIT) vide order dated 23.8.2010 (Annexure A-2) granted registration to the Trust under Section 12AA of the Act on the directions of the Tribunal. The CIT issued notices dated 22.6.2012 (Annexure A-3) and dated 23.10.2012 (Annexure A-4) to the Trust to show cause as to why the GURBACHAN SINGH 2015.10.07 16:01 authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh -3- registration granted under Section 12AA of the Act be not cancelled under Section 12AA(3) of the Act. Vide order dated 18.2.2013, the CIT cancelled the registration under Section 12AA of the Act of the Trust by holding that its income was not exempted since 1.4.2003 and was, therefore, taxable. The registration was cancelled in view of the amended provision of Section 2(15) of the Act w.e.f. 1.4.2009 and holding that the Trust is engaged in the business, trade and commerce. Feeling aggrieved, the Trust filed an appeal before the Tribunal who vide order dated 09.12.2013 (Annexure A-6) upheld the order of the CIT and dismissed the appeal. Hence, the present appeal.

4.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

5.

Learned counsel for the assessee submitted that in view of the provisions of 1922 Act, the matter is required to be remanded to the Tribunal to adjudicate whether the activities of the appellant were covered within the meaning of 'charitable' in nature or not even after the insertion of the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act w.e.f. 1.4.2009 i.e. in respect of the assessment years 2009-10 onwards. Learned counsel for the revenue supported the order passed by the Tribunal.

6.

Similar issue came up before this Court in ITA No. 73 of 2013 (Improvement Trust through Shri APS Virk s/o Late Shri Kartar Singh Virk, Chairman, Dr. Mela Ram Road, Bathinda, Punjab v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan, Amritsar) wherein this Court vide order dated 6.8.2014 remanded the matter to the Tribunal to decide the same afresh keeping in view the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act inserted w.e.f. April 1, 2009 with reference to the provisions of the 1922 Act after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties in accordance with law. GURBACHAN SINGH 2015.10.07 16:01 authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh -4-

7.

In view of the above, the order dated 9.12.2013 (Annexure A-6) passed by the Tribunal is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication keeping in view the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act inserted w.e.f. April 1, 2009 with reference to the provisions of the 1922 Act after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties in accordance with law. Needless to say that anything observed hereinbefore shall not be taken to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. However, the Tribunal shall make sincere efforts to decide the matter expeditiously. The appeal stands disposed of. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE September 21, 2015 (RAMENDRA JAIN) gbs JUDGE GURBACHAN SINGH 2015.10.07 16:01 authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →