THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. KUNDAN VIDYA MANDIR ALUMNI ASSOCIATION, LUDHIANA (PAN: AADAK0049H)
What were the facts?
The assessee, Kundan Vidya Mandir Alumni Association, Ludhiana, applied for exemption under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, claiming to be a charitable institution. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh (the Revenue), rejected the application. The assessee appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), presenting an order under Section 12A(a) granted to the main school approximately 15 years prior. The ITAT, by an order dated 22.02.2017, remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for reconsideration. The Revenue filed an appeal against the ITAT's order before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the arguments of both sides were too extreme. It found that the certification of the main school as a charitable institution was not entirely irrelevant, nor did it automatically entitle the alumni association to exemption as a matter of right. The Tribunal's action of remanding the case to the Commissioner for reconsideration was deemed not illegal. The Tribunal had not reversed any finding but had directed the Commissioner to consider an additional document, the relevance of which the Commissioner would determine. Furthermore, the High Court noted that the respondent was a nascent organization when it initially filed its application, and additional time had passed, allowing the Commissioner to assess its current records to verify if it met the criteria under Section 12AA. Consequently, the High Court found no reason to interfere with the Tribunal's order.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the order of the Commissioner rejecting the assessee's application for exemption under Section 12AA was legal and whether the order under Section 12A(a) in favour of the main school was irrelevant. The Revenue argued that the Commissioner's order was legal and that the Section 12A(a) order for the main school had no bearing on the alumni association's application. The assessee contended that as the main school was recognized as a charitable institution, its alumni association, also not being a profit-making organization, should be entitled to exemption under Section 12AA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
222 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : 09.12.2019 The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh. ...... Appellant versus Kundan Vidya Mandir Alumni Association, Ludhiana ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE LALIT BATRA *** Present :- Mr. Denesh Goyal, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Radhika Suri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M.S.Kanda, Advocate for the respondent. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
The present appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'), against the order dated 22.02.2017, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar, in ITA No.582/(Asr.)/2016. 2. The claim of the respondent was that it was an alumni association of a school and was set up for charitable purposes and was therefore entitled to the exemption under Section 12AA. The Commissioner rejected the application. In appeal the assessee placed on record an order under Section 12 A(a) in respect of the main school which had been granted about 15 years ago. On the basis of this the Tribunal POOJA SHARMA
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 634/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 633/CHANDI/2024[2015-16]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026