THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. WESTERN AGRI SEEDS LTD.

TAXAP/784/2019HC GujaratGJHC24074242201927 January 2020Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What were the facts?

The Revenue has filed this Tax Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad 'B' Bench, dated June 27, 2019. The appeal pertains to Assessment Year 2013-14 and concerns the deletion of disallowances made by the Assessing Officer. The disallowances relate to an amount of Rs. 3,67,98,650/- on account of discount and rate difference, and Rs. 1,65,38,800/- made under Section 40(A)(2)(b) of the Act. The assessee is Western Agri Seeds Ltd. The High Court notes that identical questions of law were raised in a previous appeal (Tax Appeal No. 834 of 2019) concerning the same assessee for Assessment Year 2010-11, which this Court had declined to admit.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the present Tax Appeal fails and is dismissed. This decision is based on the fact that the Court had previously declined to admit Tax Appeal No. 834 of 2019, which involved the very same assessee and identical questions of law for Assessment Year 2010-11. The reasoning is that since the Court had already taken a view on these identical questions of law by not admitting the earlier appeal, it would follow the same course of action for the present appeal. The operative direction is the dismissal of the Tax Appeal. No issues were expressly left undecided.

What were the issues?

The Tribunal had to decide the following questions of law: 1. Whether the Appellate Tribunal was correct in law and facts in upholding the order of the CIT(A) for deleting disallowance on account of discount and rate difference amounting to Rs. 3,67,98,650/-? 2. Whether the Appellate Tribunal was correct in law and facts in upholding the order of the CIT(A) for deleting disallowances made under Section 40(A)(2)(b) amounting to Rs. 1,65,38,800/-? The Revenue contended that the Appellate Tribunal erred in upholding the deletion of these disallowances. The judgment does not record specific contentions from the assessee or any authorities, circulars, or precedents relied upon by either party. The Court's decision is based on its prior order in a similar case.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260A,Section 40(A)(2)(b)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
C/TAXAP/784/2019 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 784 of 2019 ========================================================== THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus WESTERN AGRI SEEDS LTD. ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA Date : 27/01/2020

ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)

1.

This Tax Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the act, 1961') is at the instance of the Revenue and is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad 'B' Bench, dated 27th June 2019 in the ITA No. 2237/Ahd/2017 for the A.Y. 2013-14. 2. The Revenue has proposed following two questions of law for the consideration of this Court : “[A] Whether the Appellate Tribunal is correct, considering the facts and circumstances of the ca

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 40(A)(2)(b)

All 40 judgments and leading authorities on Section 40(A)(2)(b) →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →