BHADRESH MANSUKHLAL DODHIA,BHIWANDI vs. DCIT-CC-3, THANE, THANE

PDF · subscribers
ITSSA 2220/MUM/2025Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 November 2025AY 2015-167 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessments framed under section 153A were vitiated for want of jurisdiction. The core issue was whether additions based solely on documents seized from third parties could be made under section 153A. The Tribunal noted that section 153C mandates that where seized material belongs to or pertains to a person other than the person searched, the Assessing Officer must hand over such material to the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over the 'other person' and proceed strictly in accordance with section 153A as if search-based proceedings were initiated in that person's case. The legislative scheme draws a clear distinction between material seized from the person searched (falling under section 153A) and material seized from a third person but relating to another assessee (falling under section 153C). Since the alleged 'hundi papers' were not seized from the assessee's premises but from third parties, the Assessing Officer was obliged to record satisfaction under section 153C. The assumption of jurisdiction under section 153A without resort to section 153C was patently without authority of law. Consequently, the assessments were quashed. In view of this decision, the other grounds regarding the alteration of the statutory provision by the CIT(A) and the merits of the additions were rendered purely academic and not adjudicated.

What were the facts?

These appeals by the assessee, Bhadresh Mansukhlal Dodhia, challenge the common order of the CIT(A), Pune-11, for assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16, and 2016-17. The assessments were completed under section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, following a search under section 132 on 27.11.2019. The core issue revolves around additions made based on documents seized from third parties (M/s Viral Textile and Jinesh Enterprises) rather than the assessee's premises. The Assessing Officer invoked section 153A, but the assessee contends section 153C should have been applied. Additions were originally made under section 69D and section 68, totaling ₹51,00,000 for AY 2014-15, ₹1,10,00,000 for AY 2015-16, and ₹80,00,000 under section 69D along with ₹75,00,000 under section 68 for AY 2016-17.

What were the issues?

1. Whether additions made solely on the basis of documents seized from third parties could validly be made under section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or whether the mandate of section 153C ought to have been invoked (question of law and fact, concerning Section 153A and Section 153C). Assessee's contentions: The additions were based on 'hundi papers' seized from third parties, not the assessee's premises. Therefore, the Assessing Officer should have invoked section 153C, and proceeding under section 153A is a jurisdictional error. Revenue's contentions: Not recorded in the judgment. 2. Whether the CIT(A) was legally justified in altering the statutory provision under which additions were sustained, from section 69D to section 69, and whether the impugned amounts constituted unexplained investments (question of law and fact, concerning Section 69D and Section 69). Assessee's contentions: The CIT(A) erred in altering the statutory provision applied and disputed the character of the impugned amounts as unexplained investments. Revenue's contentions: Not recorded in the judgment.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 153A,Section 153C,Section 132,Section 143(3),Section 69D,Section 69,Section 68

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “B” MUMBAI

Before: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT & SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY

For Appellant: Mr. Satyaprakash R. Singh, CIT-DR
For Respondent: Mr. Satyaprakash R. Singh, CIT-DR
Pronounced: 25/11/2025

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “B” MUMBAI

BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY (JUDICIAL MEMBER)

IT(SS)A No. 2221, 2220 & 2219/MUM/2025 Assessment Year: 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17

Bhadresh Mansukhlal Dodhia, DCIT-CC-3, 60/100 New Mavji Compound, Room No. 12, A Wing, 6th floor, Vs. Behind Ratan, Talkies Narpoli, Ashar IT Park, Thane West, Bhiwandi-421302. Thane-400604 PAN NO. AFHPD 2871 E Appellant Respondent

: Ms. Simran Dhawan Assessee by Revenue by : Mr. Satyaprakash R. Singh, CIT-DR

: 04/09/2025 Date of Hearing Date of pronouncement : 25/11/2025

ORDER PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM

These appeals by the assessee are arising from a common order dated 12.02.2025 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income- tax (Appeals), Pune-11 [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17, which arises from assessments completed under section 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) for assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17, raise common questions—both on jurisdiction and on merits. Given the

Bhadresh Mansukhlal Dodhia Bhadresh Mansukhlal Dodhia 2 IT(SS)A No. 2221, 2220 & 2219/MUM/2025 IT(SS)A No. 2221, 2220 & 2219/MUM/2025

overlapping facts, common seized material, and identical legal overlapping facts, common seized material, and identical legal overlapping facts, common seized material, and identical legal contentions, we heard all the appeals together and are being contentions, we heard all the appeals together and are being contentions, we heard all the appeals together and are being disposed of by this consol disposed of by this consolidated order for sake of convenience and idated order for sake of convenience and avoid repetition of facts. avoid repetition of facts.

2.

The core issue urged before us is whether additions based The core issue urged before us is whether additions based The core issue urged before us is whether additions based solely on documents seized from third parties could validly be made solely on documents seized from third parties could validly be made solely on documents seized from third parties could validly be made in proceedings initiated under section 153A, or whether the in proceedings initiated under section 153A, or whether th in proceedings initiated under section 153A, or whether th statutory mandate of section 153C ought to have been invoked. The statutory mandate of section 153C ought to have been invoked. The statutory mandate of section 153C ought to have been invoked. The assessee has further questioned the nature of the additions assessee has further questioned the nature of the additions assessee has further questioned the nature of the additions sustained by the learned CIT(A) and the legality of converting sustained by the learned CIT(A) and the legality of converting sustained by the learned CIT(A) and the legality of converting additions originally made under section 69D into those under additions originally made under section 69D into those under additions originally made under section 69D into those under section 69.

2.1 In the present appeals, the assessee has assailed the validity In the present appeals, the assessee has assailed the validity In the present appeals, the assessee has assailed the validity of the assessments framed under section 153A of the Income-tax of the assessments framed under section 153A of the Income of the assessments framed under section 153A of the Income Act, 1961 (“the Act”) both on jurisdictional grounds and on merits. Act, 1961 (“the Act”) both on jurisdictional grounds and on merits. Act, 1961 (“the Act”) both on jurisdictional grounds and on merits. The common legal grievance across all three appeals is that the The common legal grievance across all three appea The common legal grievance across all three appea additions have been founded exclusively upon documents seized additions have been founded exclusively upon documents seized additions have been founded exclusively upon documents seized from the premises of third parties. According to the assessee, such from the premises of third parties. According to the assessee, such from the premises of third parties. According to the assessee, such material, if at all capable of supporting any addition, could only material, if at all capable of supporting any addition, could only material, if at all capable of supporting any addition, could only have been acted upon by invoking the machine have been acted upon by invoking the machinery of section 153C of ry of section 153C of the Act. The assessee, therefore, challenges the very assumption of the Act. The assessee, therefore, challenges the very assumption of the Act. The assessee, therefore, challenges the very assumption of jurisdiction under section 153A. On merits, the assessee has jurisdiction under section 153A. On merits, the assessee has jurisdiction under section 153A. On merits, the assessee has further objected to the action of the learned CIT(A) in altering the further objected to the action of the learned CIT(A) in altering the further objected to the action of the learned CIT(A) in altering the statutory provision applied statutory provision applied—namely, in sustaining the addition in sustaining the addition

Bhadresh Mansukhlal Dodhia Bhadresh Mansukhlal Dodhia 3 IT(SS)A No. 2221, 2220 & 2219/MUM/2025 IT(SS)A No. 2221, 2220 & 2219/MUM/2025

under section 69 instead of section 69D under section 69 instead of section 69D—and has also disputed the and has also disputed the character of the impugned amounts as unexplained investments. character of the impugned amounts as unexplained investments. character of the impugned amounts as unexplained investments.

3.

We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. The material facts are not in dispute. The material facts are not in dispute. A search under section 132 A search under section 132 was conducted on 27.11.2019 in the Dodhia Group, including the was conducted on 27.11.2019 in the Dodhia Group, including the was conducted on 27.11.2019 in the Dodhia Group, including the assessee. Consequent notices under section 153A were issued for assessee. Consequent notices under section 153A were issued for assessee. Consequent notices under section 153A were issued for assessment years 2014 assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17, which are the 17, which are the subject-matter of these appeals. The ass matter of these appeals. The assessments were completed essments were completed under section 143(3) read with section 153A on 30.09.2021, under section 143(3) read with section 153A on 30.09.2021, under section 143(3) read with section 153A on 30.09.2021, wherein additions of ₹51,00,000 (AY 2014-15), ₹1,10,00,000 (AY wherein additions of 1,10,00,000 (AY 2015-16), and ₹80,00,000 under section 69D along with 80,00,000 under section 69D along with ₹75,00,000 80,00,000 under section 69D along with under section 68 (AY 2016 under section 68 (AY 2016-17) were made.

3.1 The consistent case of the assessee is that the entire basis of The consistent case of the assessee is that the entire basis of The consistent case of the assessee is that the entire basis of the additions under section 69D is a set of “hundi papers” seized the additions under section 69D is a set of “hundi papers” seized the additions under section 69D is a set of “hundi papers” seized not from the assessee but from the premises of M/s Viral Textile, a not from the assessee but from the premises of M/s Viral Textile, a not from the assessee but from the premises of M/s Viral Textile, a proprietary concern of Shri proprietary concern of Shri Viral Dhanani and Jinesh Enter and Jinesh Enterprises, another proprietary concern of Shri Ninesh Dodhia. It is contended another proprietary concern of Shri Ninesh Dodhia. It is contended another proprietary concern of Shri Ninesh Dodhia. It is contended that the alleged hundis, though assumed by the Assessing Officer to that the alleged hundis, though assumed by the Assessing Officer to that the alleged hundis, though assumed by the Assessing Officer to pertain to the assessee, were never seized from his premises and pertain to the assessee, were never seized from his premises and pertain to the assessee, were never seized from his premises and could have been acted upon only under section 153C. The could have been acted upon only under section 15 could have been acted upon only under section 15 Assessing Officer, however, proceeded on the premise that the Assessing Officer, however, proceeded on the premise that the Assessing Officer, however, proceeded on the premise that the seized documents belonged to the assessee and invoked section seized documents belonged to the assessee and invoked section seized documents belonged to the assessee and invoked section 153A alone.

Bhadresh Mansukhlal Dodhia Bhadresh Mansukhlal Dodhia 4 IT(SS)A No. 2221, 2220 & 2219/MUM/2025 IT(SS)A No. 2221, 2220 & 2219/MUM/2025

4.

We have carefully considered the rival submissions. For ready We have carefully considered the rival submissions. For ready We have carefully considered the rival submissions. For ready reference, the statutory text of section 153C reference, the statutory text of section 153C has been reproduced in has been reproduced in the order:

“Assessment of income of any other person. Assessment of income of any other person. 68 153C. 69 [(1)] 70[Notwithstanding anything contained in [Notwithstanding anything contained in section 139, [Notwithstanding anything contained in section 147, section 148 section 148, section 149, section 151 and and section 153, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that,- (a) any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing, any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing, any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing, seized or requisitioned, seized or requisitioned, 71belongs to; or (b) any books of account or any books of account or documents, seized or requisitioned, documents, seized or requisitioned, pertains or pertain to, or any information contained therein, pertains or pertain to, or any information contained therein, pertains or pertain to, or any information contained therein, relates to, relates to, a person other than the person referred to in a person other than the person referred to in section 153A section 153A, then, the books of account or documents or assets, books of account or documents or assets, seized or requisitioned shall seized or requisitioned shall be handed over to the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such be handed over to the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such be handed over to the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such other person] 72[and that Assessing Officer shall proceed against each [and that Assessing Officer shall proceed against each [and that Assessing Officer shall proceed against each such other person and issue notice and assess or r such other person and issue notice and assess or reassess the income eassess the income of the other person in accordance with the provisions of section 153A, of the other person in accordance with the provisions of of the other person in accordance with the provisions of if, that Assessing Officer is satisfied that the books of account or if, that Assessing Officer is satisfied that the books of account or if, that Assessing Officer is satisfied that the books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned have a bearing on the documents or assets seized or requisitioned have a bearing on t documents or assets seized or requisitioned have a bearing on t determination of the total income of such other person 73[for six determination of the total income of such other person determination of the total income of such other person assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which search is conducted or relevant to the previous year in which search is conducted or relevant to the previous year in which search is conducted or requisition is made and] for the requisition is made and] for the relevant assessment year or years relevant assessment year or years referred to in sub-section (1) of section (1) of section 153A] :] 74 [Provided that in case of such other person, the reference to the date that in case of such other person, the reference to the date that in case of such other person, the reference to the date of initiation of the search under of initiation of the search under section 132 or making of requisition or making of requisition under section 132A section 132A in the second proviso to 75[sub-section (1) of] section (1) of] sec- tion 153A shall be construed as reference to the date of receiv shall be construed as reference to the date of receiv shall be construed as reference to the date of receiving the books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned by the books of account or documents or assets seized or requi books of account or documents or assets seized or requi Assessing Officer having jur Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such other person :] isdiction over such other person :] 76 [Provided further Provided further that the Central Government may by rules that the Central Government may by rules 77 made by it and published in the Official Gazette, specify the class or made by it and published in the Official Gazette, specify the class or made by it and published in the Official Gazette, specify the class or classes of cases in respect of such other person, in which the in respect of such other person, in which the Assessing Officer shall not be required to issue notice for assessing or Assessing Officer shall not be required to issue notice for assessing or Assessing Officer shall not be required to issue notice for assessing or reassessing the total income for six assessment years immediately reassessing the total income for six assessment years immediately reassessing the total income for six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which search is conducted or requisition is made earch is conducted or requisition is made 78[and for the relevant [and for the relevant

Bhadresh Mansukhlal Dodhia Bhadresh Mansukhlal Dodhia 5 IT(SS)A No. 2221, 2220 & 2219/MUM/2025 IT(SS)A No. 2221, 2220 & 2219/MUM/2025

assessment year or years as referred to in sub assessment year or years as referred to in sub-section (1) of section (1) of section 153A] except in cases where any assessment or ] except in cases where any assessment or reassessment has reassessment has abated.] 79 [(2) Where books of account or documents or assets seized or [(2) Where books of account or documents or assets seized or [(2) Where books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned as referred to in sub requisitioned as referred to in sub-section (1) has or have been received section (1) has or have been received by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such other person by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such oth by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such oth after the due date for furnishing the return of income for the after the due date for furnishing the return of income for the after the due date for furnishing the return of income for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which search is assessment year relevant to the previous year in which search is assessment year relevant to the previous year in which search is conducted under section 132 section 132 or requisition is made under or requisition is made under section 132A and in respect of such assessment year and in respect of such assessment year- (a) no return of income has been furnished by such other person no return of income has been furnished by such other person no return of income has been furnished by such other person and no notice under sub and no notice under sub-section (1) of section 142 section 142 has been issued to him, or issued to him, or (b) a return of income has been furnished by such other person but a return of income has been furnished by such other person but a return of income has been furnished by such other person but no notice under sub no notice under sub-section (2) of section 143 section 143 has been served and limitation of serving the notice under sub and limitation of serving the notice under sub and limitation of serving the notice under sub-section (2) of section 143 section 143 has expired, or (c) assessment or reassessment, if any, has been made, assessment or reassessment, if any, has been made, assessment or reassessment, if any, has been made, before the date of receiving the books of account or documents or before the date of receiving the books of account or documents or before the date of receiving the books of account or documents or assets seized or requisitioned by the Assessing Officer having assets seized or requisitioned by the Assessing Officer having assets seized or requisitioned by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such other person, such Assessing Officer shall issue jurisdiction over such other person, such Assessing Officer shall issue jurisdiction over such other person, such Assessing Officer shall issue the notice and assess or reassess total income of such other person of the notice and assess or reassess total income of such the notice and assess or reassess total income of such such assessment year in the manner provided in such assessment year in the manner provided in section 153A section 153A.] 80 [(3) Nothing contained in this section shall apply in relation to a [(3) Nothing contained in this section shall apply in relation to a [(3) Nothing contained in this section shall apply in relation to a search initiated under search initiated under section 132 or books of account, other or books of account, other documents or any assets requisitioned under documents or any assets requisitioned under section 132A section 132A on or after the 1st day of April, 2021.] the 1st day of April, 2021.]” 4.1 A plain and harmonious reading of the provision leaves no A plain and harmonious reading of the provision leaves no A plain and harmonious reading of the provision leaves no room for doubt. Where the seized material “belongs to” or “pertains for doubt. Where the seized material “belongs to” or “pertains for doubt. Where the seized material “belongs to” or “pertains to” a person other than the person searched, the Assessing Officer to” a person other than the person searched, the Assessing Officer to” a person other than the person searched, the Assessing Officer of the searched person is statutorily mandated to hand over such of the searched person is statutorily mandated to hand over such of the searched person is statutorily mandated to hand over such material to the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over the “other material to the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over t material to the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over t person”, who shall thereafter proceed strictly in accordance with person”, who shall thereafter proceed strictly in accordance with person”, who shall thereafter proceed strictly in accordance with section 153A as if search section 153A as if search-based proceedings were initiated in that based proceedings were initiated in that person’s case. The legislative scheme thus draws an explicit The legislative scheme thus draws an explicit The legislative scheme thus draws an explicit

Bhadresh Mansukhlal Dodhia Bhadresh Mansukhlal Dodhia 6 IT(SS)A No. 2221, 2220 & 2219/MUM/2025 IT(SS)A No. 2221, 2220 & 2219/MUM/2025

distinction between material seized from the person searched distinction between material seized from the person distinction between material seized from the person (falling under section 153A) and material seized from a third person (falling under section 153A) and material seized from a third person (falling under section 153A) and material seized from a third person but relating to another assessee (falling under section 153C). Once but relating to another assessee (falling under section 153C). Once but relating to another assessee (falling under section 153C). Once Parliament has prescribed the specific route through which Parliament has prescribed the specific route through which Parliament has prescribed the specific route through which additions based on third additions based on third-party seized material are to be made, any to be made, any assessment framed by bypassing this route is contrary to law and assessment framed by bypassing this route is contrary to law and assessment framed by bypassing this route is contrary to law and void ab initio.

4.2 In the present case, it is an admitted position on record that In the present case, it is an admitted position on record that In the present case, it is an admitted position on record that the alleged hundi papers were not seized from the premises of the the alleged hundi papers were not seized from the premises of the the alleged hundi papers were not seized from the premises of the assessee. These papers wer assessee. These papers were found at the premises of third parties e found at the premises of third parties belonging to the Dodhia Group. The Assessing Officer was, belonging to the Dodhia Group. The Assessing Officer was, belonging to the Dodhia Group. The Assessing Officer was, therefore, obliged to record satisfaction under section 153C and therefore, obliged to record satisfaction under section 153C and therefore, obliged to record satisfaction under section 153C and proceed in accordance with that provision. The assumption of proceed in accordance with that provision. The assumption of proceed in accordance with that provision. The assumption of jurisdiction under section 153A jurisdiction under section 153A, without resort to section 153C, is , without resort to section 153C, is patently without authority of law. Consequently, the assessments patently without authority of law. Consequently, the assessments patently without authority of law. Consequently, the assessments framed for AYs 2014- -15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 under section 153A 17 under section 153A stand vitiated for want of jurisdiction. stand vitiated for want of jurisdiction. We accordingly hold that the We accordingly hold that the impugned assessments impugned assessments are unsustainable and are hereby quashed. are unsustainable and are hereby quashed.

4.3 In view of our decision on the legal issue, the other grounds In view of our decision on the legal issue, the other grounds In view of our decision on the legal issue, the other grounds— whether relating to the alteration of the statutory provision by the whether relating to the alteration of the statutory provision by the whether relating to the alteration of the statutory provision by the learned CIT(A) or the merits of the additions learned CIT(A) or the merits of the additions—are rendered purely are rendered purely academic and do not call for adjudication. do not call for adjudication.

Bhadresh Mansukhlal Dodhia Bhadresh Mansukhlal Dodhia 7 IT(SS)A No. 2221, 2220 & 2219/MUM/2025 IT(SS)A No. 2221, 2220 & 2219/MUM/2025

5.

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed. In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed. In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed.

Order pronounced in the open Court on ounced in the open Court on 25/11/2025. /11/2025.

Sd/- Sd/ Sd/- (NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY) (OM PRAKASH KANT OM PRAKASH KANT) JUDICIAL MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated: 25/11/2025 Rahul Sharma, Sr. P.S. Copy of the Order forwarded to Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. CIT 4. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. Guard file.

BY ORDER, BY ORDER, //True Copy// (Assistant Registrar) (Assistant Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai ITAT, Mumbai

More judgments on Section 153A

All 18,957 judgments and leading authorities on Section 153A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →