DR. SUBBIAN CHARITABLE TRUST,POLLACHI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) had rejected the assessee's application solely on the ground of delay in filing Form No.10AB. However, CBDT Circular No.06/2026, dated 02.07.2026, specifically provides that delays in furnishing Form No.10AB electronically between 01.10.2025 and 31.03.2026, beyond the due date of 30.09.2025, shall be condoned, subject to stipulated conditions. Crucially, paragraph 4 of the Circular addresses applications already rejected solely on the ground of such delay, stating that the delay shall be deemed condoned and the application shall be disposed of on merits. Given this subsequent development, the Tribunal concluded that the matter required reconsideration by the Commissioner. Accordingly, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was restored to the Commissioner for disposal on merits in accordance with law and CBDT Circular No.06/2026, after providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Dr. Subbian Charitable Trust, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai. The Commissioner had rejected the Trust's Form No.10AB, filed for seeking approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The rejection was solely on the grounds that the form was filed beyond the prescribed due date of 30.09.2025. The assessee contended that CBDT Circular No.06/2026 condoned delays in filing Form No.10AB electronically between 01.10.2025 and 31.03.2026, and that applications rejected solely on delay grounds were also deemed condoned. The assessee requested the matter be restored to the Commissioner for fresh consideration.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the delay in filing Form No.10AB for seeking approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, beyond the prescribed due date of 30.09.2025, is condonable in light of CBDT Circular No.06/2026? Assessee's Contentions: - The assessee argued that CBDT Circular No.06/2026 condoned the delay in filing Form No.10AB electronically for approval under Section 80G(5) when furnished between 01.10.2025 and 31.03.2026. - It was further submitted that the Circular specifically states that where an application was rejected solely on the ground of delay, such delay is also deemed to have been condoned. - Therefore, the matter should be restored to the Commissioner for fresh consideration in accordance with law. Revenue's Contentions: - The Revenue supported the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K & SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO
PER GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai dated 29.06.2026, rejecting Form No.10AB filed for seeking approval u/s.80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’). Dr. Subbian Charitable Trust
At the very outset, we notice that the CIT(E) rejected the assessee’s application in limine solely on the ground that Form No.10AB seeking approval un
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)
- Nikunj Mahendrabhai Adani, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-1(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2026/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1491/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1484/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026