SHRI KRISHAN GAUSHALA SAMITI,JHUNJHUNU vs. CIT EXEMPTION,JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that in the interest of justice, the impugned orders passed by the CIT(E) should be set aside. The Tribunal granted the assessee trust one more opportunity of hearing before the CIT(E) to pass orders in accordance with the provisions of law. The reasoning was based on the rival submissions and the perusal of materials on record, including the registration application filed before the RPT authorities. The ratio decidendi is that procedural deficiencies, if curable and if both parties agree to a remand for proper adjudication, should be addressed by providing an opportunity to rectify them. The operative direction was to set aside the orders and grant a further opportunity to the assessee. No issue was expressly left undecided.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Shri Krishan Gaushala Samiti, filed two appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jaipur Benches, against separate orders dated 13.03.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur. These orders denied the assessee registration under Section 12AB and Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The reasons for denial included non-registration under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959, and the filing of incomplete Form 10AB. The assessment years are not recorded. The assessee's counsel requested the matter be set aside to the CIT(E) to allow the filing of necessary details. The Revenue's counsel had no objection to this course of action, provided the assessee produced all relevant materials.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the denial of registration under Section 12AB and Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) was justified, considering the assessee's application for registration under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959, and the filing of incomplete Form 10AB? (Question of law and fact, turning on Sections 12AB and 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959). Assessee's contention: The assessee argued that it had applied for registration under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959, and requested the matter be set aside to the CIT(E) to enable the filing of all necessary details for obtaining registration under Sections 12AB and 80G(5). Revenue's contention: The Revenue's counsel had no objection to setting aside the matter, provided the assessee submitted all relevant materials, details, and evidence for the grant of registration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, “A” BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA & SHRI T. R. SENTHIL KUMAR
Per T. R. Senthil Kumar, JM :-
These two appeals are filed by the assessee as against separate orders both dated 13.03.2026 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur denying registration under section 12 AB and 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for non-registration under Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 and for filing incomplete Form 10 AB and consequently denying registration u/s 80G of the Act. Asst. Year: NA
At the outset, Learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee trust applied for registration in Form No. 6 for registration under RPT Act vide application dated 23rd September 2026, and copy
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026