ASLAM KHAN,BHIWADI (ALWAR) vs. ITO BHIWADI, BHIWADI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the appeal was filed by the assessee against the appellate order dated 21.02.2025, which arose from a reassessment order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for Assessment Year 2014-15. The brief facts indicate that the assessee, engaged in trading building material, declared an income of Rs. 3,72,460 for AY 2014-15. Information received by the department suggested the assessee purchased an immovable property on 05.07.2013 for Rs. 1.5 crores with stamp duty expenses of Rs. 11,73,850, with the assessee's share being Rs. 80,86,925. However, the judgment does not record any arguments from either the assessee or the revenue regarding the validity of the reassessment proceedings or the reassessment order itself. Consequently, the Tribunal did not decide on the issues presented or provide any reasoning or operative directions. The judgment is incomplete as it does not contain the substantive decision of the Tribunal.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Aslam Khan, an individual engaged in the trading of building material, filed a return of income for Assessment Year 2014-15 on October 21, 2014, declaring a total income of Rs. 3,72,460. The Revenue received information indicating that the assessee purchased an immovable property on July 5, 2013, for Rs. 1.5 crores, with stamp duty expenses of Rs. 11,73,850. The assessee's share in this transaction was Rs. 80,86,925. The appeal is filed by the assessee against the appellate order dated February 21, 2025, passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi. This order arose from a reassessment order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, were valid, considering the information received by the Revenue regarding the purchase of an immovable property by the assessee. The assessee's contentions are not recorded in the judgment. The Revenue's contentions are not recorded in the judgment. 2. Whether the reassessment order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is sustainable in light of the facts presented. The assessee's contentions are not recorded in the judgment. The Revenue's contentions are not recorded in the judgment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘SMC’ BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar
PER : T. R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- This appeal is filed by the assessee as against the appellate order dated 21.02.2025 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, arising out of reassessment order passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Asst. Year 2014-15. I.T.A No. 611/JPR/2025 Page No 2 Aslam Khan
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual engaged in trading business of building material. Assessee has filed the return of income for the AY 2014-15 on 21.10.2014 declaring total income of Rs. 3,72,460/-. Information received from the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026