SARDARNI MOHINDER KAUR CHARITABLE MEMORIAL TRUST,CHANDIGARH vs. CIT EXEMPTION CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed both appeals. Regarding the classification under Section 12AB(1)(b), the Tribunal noted that while the trust deed allowed for donations to religious places, the financial analysis showed that religious donations constituted 16.9% of total donations and 16.4% of total expenses. Crucially, the Tribunal examined Section 80G(5B) which limits expenditure of a religious nature to 5% of total income. In this case, donations for religious purposes exceeded this prescribed limit. Consequently, as per Explanation 3 to Section 80G, the institution is deemed to be one where charitable purposes do not include any purpose which is wholly or substantially of a religious nature. This unambiguous language of the Act led to the rejection of both appeals. The operative direction was dismissal of both appeals.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Sardarni Mohinder Kaur Charitable Memorial Trust, filed two appeals (ITA Nos. 1061/Chd/2026 and 1062/Chd/2026) against the orders of the Ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh, dated 11/02/2026 and 12/02/2026, respectively. The first appeal challenged the classification of the trust as a religious entity under Section 12AB(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arguing its objects were charitable. The second appeal challenged the rejection of its application for approval under Section 80G(5) of the Act. For FY 2024-25, the trust had total receipts of Rs. 1,660,640, including interest income of Rs. 1,415,625 and donations of Rs. 2,45,015. Expenses incurred were Rs. 1,336,946.50, with significant amounts for education, religious purposes, and sports. The trust deed permitted donations to religious places as one of its activities.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the learned CIT(E) erred in classifying the trust as a religious entity, when its objects are charitable, and whether the assessee was provided an adequate opportunity to explain its categorization, under Section 12AB(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Whether the learned CIT(E) erred in rejecting the application for approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee's Contentions: - The trust's objects are charitable, and it also makes donations for purposes other than religious ones, making the CIT(E)'s classification as solely religious incorrect. Revenue's Contentions: - The revenue relied on the orders of the lower authorities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"ीगढ़ "ायपीठ “बी”,च"ीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “B”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: HYBRID MODE "ी लिलत कुमार, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी िवजय वमा" , लेखा सद" BEFORE: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR, JM & SHRI. VIJAY VARMA, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 1061 /Chd/ 2026 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2026-27 Sardarni Mohinder Kaur Charitable बनाम The CIT Memorial Trust Exemption H.No. 1030, Chandigarh G.P.O Chandigarh "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAATS3976R अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 1062 /Chd/ 2026 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2026-27 Sardarni Mohinder Kaur Charitable बनाम The CIT Memorial Trust Exemption H.No. 1030, Chandigarh G.P.O Chandigarh "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAATS3976R अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Ajay Jain, C.A राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Vandana Vijay Mohite, CIT, DR (Virtual Mode) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 29/09/2026 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 30/09/2026 आदेश/Order PER VIJAY VARMA, A.M: Both the above appeals have been filed by the Assessee against the respective orders of the Ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh dt. 11/02/2026 and 12/02/2026 respectively.
Since
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB(1)(b)
- Sat Guru Saran Niwas Trust, Agra vs CIT(Exemption), AgraITA 674/AGR/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Samvedna Foundation Trust, Agra vs ITO, Ward Exemption, AgraITA 496/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- S S Shah P M Jariwala N S Damanwala Surat V… vs CIT(Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8678/MUM/2026[2027 - 28]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026